discuss why is not possiblediscuss why is not possible to reduce to lowest terms 3 + x  3x

2 Answers | Add Yours

sciencesolve's profile pic

sciencesolve | Teacher | (Level 3) Educator Emeritus

Posted on

You need to notice that the members of fraction `(3+x)/(3x)` do not share duplicate factors, hence, the fraction is given in its simplest form.

You may perform a formal simplification if you write the fraction such that:

`((3 + x)*1)/((3x)*1)`

Reducing duplicate factor 1, yields:

`((3 + x)*1)/((3x)*1) = (3+x)/(3x) `

Hence, since the given form of fraction is its simplest form, it is not possible to be reduced to a simpler form than the given form.

giorgiana1976's profile pic

giorgiana1976 | College Teacher | (Level 3) Valedictorian

Posted on

I understand that you want to reduce to lowest terms. If it is about a fraction (since it is about reducing), it is obvious that the denominator and numerator are primes.

In other words, the numerator 3+x and the denominator 3x, have no common factors, it is impossible to reduce the fraction to the lowest terms.

(3+x)/3x cannot be reduced.

We’ve answered 318,957 questions. We can answer yours, too.

Ask a question