Discuss the following statement and explain the main difference between slaves and another form of property in the perception of Antebellum plantation owners: Slaves in the Antebellum South were considered property, but when slaves acquired property, the situation was considered as the acquisition of property by property, and this was never accepted or appreciated by both masters or the state.

In the Antebellum South, slaves were human property. Many people did not make much of a distinction between their slaves and other types of property; they did what they wanted with them. Others, however, tried to be fair and respectful toward their slaves. Slaves could not legally own property, but many of them did unofficially own property, and some even purchased freedom for themselves and their loved ones.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

In the Antebellum South, slaves were considered property. Even though they were human beings, they were owned by others, and therefore, all of their work, their leisure, and even their bodies belonged to their masters. They did not belong to themselves (at least in a legal sense; the moral realm is another story). Thus, they could not own anything else. They could not legally hold property, for they didn't even hold themselves.

Let's think about how this worked on a practical level. A slave owned by a master was supposed to be given the necessities of life by that master, including food, clothing, a place to live, and so on. Yet the slave could not call any of that his or her own. It continued to belong to the master. Slaves might sometimes earn wages by being lent out to other people, but those wages also did not belong to the slaves. They belonged to the master. Slaves had no legal claim to anything, not land or money or furniture or even the clothing on their backs. What's more, they had no legal claim to their children.

With all this said, however, not every slave experienced harsh conditions. Some slaves had masters who were fair and kind and even generous. With masters like those, they could keep any wages they earned or money they had been given. They could unofficially own personal property. They could even at times work to purchase their own freedom and freedom for their families. The life of a slave, though, was never secure. A good, kind master might pass away, and a slave might then belong to someone who couldn't care less about privileges or morals.

Finally, let's reflect for a moment on the difference between slave property and other property. To some people in the Antebellum South (and elsewhere), there wasn't much difference at all. A slave could be bought or sold, worked and punished, and in some cases even killed with no legal consequences. Yet many masters did recognize that their slaves were human beings, and they did the best they could to treat them with respect and dignity and to recognize that they were not anything like other kinds of property.

Last Updated by eNotes Editorial on