4 Answers | Add Yours
As a super-power, we got the worst reality check when a group of radicals came into our turf, killed our own people at-home, and made us understand for once and for all that we are vulnerable, that they are not weak, and that they mean business. International terrorism and 9/11 are not necessarily the same people nor operate under the same philosophies. That is the dangerous part: We do not know who their next target is going to be. They simply do what they do: They terrorize, bully, and abuse the civil rights of people all over the world. They are the original boogie-man; they are the kids our moms warned us about when we went to school. To me, they are sick, retrograde, and inept both mentally and socially. They are the bad seed. Which is worse, they are a strong bad seed. And the more we know about them, the better we all will get at beating them in their own game.
The background to 9-11 and al-Qeada is complex, but here is part of it. At the end of the 1970s, to forestall a change in government, the Soviets seized Afghanistan, beginning a ten-year war which led to a serious failure of the Soviet Army. Meanwhile, while selling weapons to both Iran and Iraq during their war, the US and Britain offered covert help of many sorts to the mujahadeen (or "muj" for short). This included advice from former military personnel, operations by contract agents, and supplies of arms bought from China, Bulgaria, etc. and "given" to the muj. The Jamiat-i-Islam, early in the war, were involved in the opium business, and the fighters in the Panjir Valley we worked with later on were in the hashhish business. It would be naive to pretend these products were not instrumental in paying for the weapons.
To launder funds and raise recruits from the Middle East to fight in Afghanistan, the US used a Saudi financier, whose name was Usama bin Laden. The bin Laden family was largely in the construction business in Arabia, and had financed many projects through international banking circles, including businesses associated with the Bush family. This could easily sound like a conspiracy theory, but most large international businesses use the same banks. The important thing is that bin Laden kept in touch with the ex-muj mercenaries, and gradually formed this group into al-Qaeda, which means "the Base", as in "foundation". On this foundation he intended to create a pan-Islamic, revolutionary and fundamentalist state in place of the current Mid-East states.
The 9-11 strike was planned in the Phillipines, and some of the planners were captured by Phillipine security shortly thereafter. The government warned the US, and these warnings found their way into newspapers across Europe before 9-11. Several intelligence agencies also warned us, but again let's not jump to conclusions. It is very difficult to attract the attention and change the opinion of a government. Where the National Security Council had spent the years under Clinton carefully uncovering al-Qaeda, Bush's people were convinced Saddam Hussein was at the heart of all international terrorism. We know today they were wrong.
The theory that the US and other Western countries never deal with terrorists is false. The Reagan and first Bush governments both sold weapons to terrorist groups in trade for hostages. Richard A. Clark, former chief counter-terrorist adviser to the National Security Council, has written an excellent book on the responses to terrorism by the US from Reagan to the early "W" years, entitled "Against All Enemies," which I strongly suggest. The idea that no one imagined terrorists would use airplanes is ridiculous, I myself read warning of this by FBI anti-terrorist experts in the late 1970s.
As to why extremist fundamentalist muslims dislike America, look around at the mass consumer culture, with rampant use of overt sex to sell everything from television sets to, well, sex. This offends many people. Here in America, as in many countries in Europe and Asia, if we dislike something we generally ignore it unless it is in our face. But some right-wing extremist Christians apparently cannot do this, and so complain about and condemn it. Same with the extremist muslims. Many feel the corporate greed of Wall Street is destroying the world, and fear change in general.
I think the most interesting aspect of the 9/11 attacks (from the POV of Americans) is that we never tried to find out why the attacks happened. After 9/11, The American media didn't give the American people a forum to discuss the wider issues of the attacks; instead the media drowned any debate in simplistic, patriotic tub-thumping about, 'an unprovoked attack on Freedom'. Even today, eight years later, most people don't actually know why Al Qaeda attacked the US on September the 11th or what their objectives are.
The famous ancient Chinese philosopher Sun Tzu said,
"Know your enemy and know yourself and you can fight a hundred battles without disaster.”
If you want to know your enemy in the War on Terror, you need to discover the short, medium and long term objectives of Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda. It is very dangerous to have an enemy who you don't understand.
Much more importantly, it is very likely that Muslim's anger and aggression towards America is the direct result of American actions. One of the world's major civilisations has become so angry at America that a small percentage are willing to blow themselves up to take revenge. Why?
What has America done to make Muslims so angry?
And why hasn't America bothered to findout?
Are we so invincible and so good that we don't need to listen to our enemy's accusations?
We’ve answered 318,947 questions. We can answer yours, too.Ask a question