What is the difference between distributive and integrative negotiation?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The basic difference between these two types of negotiation has to do with the "pie" that is being negotiated.  

In distributive negotiations, the size of the "pie" is fixed.  This makes this type of negotiation a zero-sum game.  Whenever one side gains, the other side must necessarily lose.  For...

See
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

The basic difference between these two types of negotiation has to do with the "pie" that is being negotiated.  

In distributive negotiations, the size of the "pie" is fixed.  This makes this type of negotiation a zero-sum game.  Whenever one side gains, the other side must necessarily lose.  For this reason, this kind of negotiation tends to be very combative and unfriendly.

In integrative negotiations, the size of the pie is not fixed.  It is possible for both sides to gain in such a negotiation.  Therefore, negotiations of this sort can be less competitive and more cooperative.

Participants in a negotiation are not always clear as to which type of negotiation is going on.  It can be difficult to tell if a situation is zero-sum or not.  Therefore, it is possible to have different sides of a negotiation conceiving of the negotiation in different ways.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team