Christopher Columbus: Missionary or Exploiter?Christopher Columbus: Missionary or Exploiter?

2 Answers | Add Yours

litteacher8's profile pic

litteacher8 | High School Teacher | (Level 3) Distinguished Educator

Posted on

I agree. I have never seen any evidence to suggest that Columbus was a Missionary or had any evangelical tendencies. He was in it for the money, plain and simple. Although he did spread diseases and disasters, one could argue that in addition to exploiting the native peoples he also exposed them to some new ideas.
pohnpei397's profile pic

pohnpei397 | College Teacher | (Level 3) Distinguished Educator

Posted on

If these are the only two options (which I do not think they should be) then I would have to go for "exploiter."  Columbus was clearly not (in my mind) mainly focused on exposing people he found to Christianity.

In my opinion, Columbus's main goals were glory, power, and wealth (three related things).  He did not go specifically to exploit the people he found -- the went to make himself rich and important.  But if I have to pick between him being an exploiter and a missionary, I would have to say that trying to get rich and famous is more like exploiting than it is like being a missionary.

We’ve answered 318,912 questions. We can answer yours, too.

Ask a question