As a Christian I feel I should believe the Biblical story of Noah and The Flood, but is it really possible? I have always been a Christian and I have always been brought up to believe that the Bible is completely true. And I want to believe it is completely true. But I have difficulty with the story of Noah. I can't imagine how Noah could have fulfilled God's instructions to collect two of every land animal on Earth and build a boat big enough for them all to survive on. Is it actually possible?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

I believe it is nothing more than oral history based on a true event.

The Soviet Union once conducted research on the bottom of the Black Sea (core samples) that revealed a sudden shift in the fossil records from fresh water life forms (as in a lake) to salt water life forms (as in a sudden flood of sea water). Additionally, core samples revealing a sudden shift from land life forms to salt water life forms strongly suggests that the neolithic villages along the Black Sea were wiped out by a sudden flood which enlarged dramatically that body of water.

The plausible explanation of this could be the melting ice destroying a land bridge between the Mediterranean Sea and what is now the Black Sea, destroying said villages. Similar flood stories are recorded in other cultures from this time frame as well.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team

Videos

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The "Flood Story" isn't a pillar of evidence of God.  Stories don't prove evidence of anything, except storytelling.  A famous critic said, "Literature is the question minus the answer."  Stories raise questions, like the one that started this discussion: "Is the Flood Story true?"  They don't answer them; otherwise, they would be called essays.

Is the "Flood Story" true?  The answer is, of course, "yes."  That doesn't mean it actually happened.  It doesn't had to have happened to be true.  Tim O'Brien said story-truth is truer than happening-truth.  And he's right.  The evidence of the story being true is the fact that it has survived thousands of years.  We have felt it in our stomachs--more than our brains.  It's part of our collective mythology.

A flood, or two floods or a million floods, aren't a pillar of evidence of God either.  Of course there have been catastrophic floods in nearly every culture.  It's inevitable.  There's also been great earthquakes, tsunamis, fires, and volcanic eruptions--none of which prove or disprove anything.  Do you think God wants natural disasters to do his talking for him?

The "Flood Story" is a pillar of evidence in storytelling.  That's why it's survived all these years in nearly every culture.  No one can argue that.

 

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

One piece of compelling historical evidence for the flood is that the same events are referenced in two other ancient texts: Mesopotamia's Epic of Gilgamesh and India's Ramayana. Gilgamesh also refers to a similar Garden of Eden and the plight of Job. The descriptions of the flood are strikingly similar in all three texts and corroborate the idea of the flood.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

In reply to #8, you and I both know that it would be pointless to enter into a debate over this issue.  I do not even share the same definition of "faith" with you; so there is no agreeable foundation upon which an "exchange of opinions" would be beneficial to you or me or, more importantly, to the poster of this discussion.

My post in response to her was to provide some hope and encouragement to someone who seems to be struggling with some ideas with which I personally struggled earlier in life and to let her know that she is not alone in her questions or search for answers.  I do not ask you to agree with me, but it is unwise for you to "wager" that I haven't begun to investigate the decades-long debate over the earth's origin.  I have taken numerous undergraduate and post-graduate classes which have presented this issue from both major viewpoints.  I have read about and studied this same issue for several years and have not capriously chosen my "beliefs."

You also misquote me. I never wrote that "I know" the Noah account is true.  I believe it is true, but again because of your definition of "belief" and "faith," that carries no weight with you, and the exchange of opinions logically ends there.

To chicagogirl, please don't simply give up on your quest for answers.  From a practical observation, I have found invariably that my happiest students, those who are most at peace, even when they come from seemingly horrendous backgrounds, are those who kindly and unashamedly practice their "faith."

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

In reference to your post for #6, try to remember that it takes faith to believe the Bible. In fact, it takes faith to believe anything in whole.  I always find it interesting that people easily accept a "theory" such as evolution which has no more scientific proof behind it than Noah's history.

If you truly believe the Bible, you must believe all of it.  There is no picking and choosing, for if you do so, you negate all of it.  This is a difficult stand to take and hold strong to, because we live in a politically correct world of relative truth and situational ethics.

I also find it intriguing when someone argues that religion is simply a journey and that it does not matter which path one takes.  I don't think that you can truly have faith in God's Word and say that we are all going to the same place through different religions.  Of course, everyone should be free to practice his/her religion, but each person who does have religious faith should defend it and realize that if his or her faith is absolute truth, all other religions must be false.  Again, this does not mean that people should go around shoving their beliefs down others' throats or using violence to promote their religion, but it does mean that you should freely adhere to the idea that if your faith says that there is only one way to heaven, then you either believe it or you don't--it's not simply true for you and not for others.

In reference to your last question, you have to decide the answer to that.  I believe that many humans choose to believe that the Bible is just good literature and fiction that man created to show his search for a god.  This makes it easier for humans to write off the truth of the Bible and not have to live by it.  If it is the exact account of God's word to man, then those who wholly believe that must be willing to suffer the scorn of the world, all while knowing that in the end, the literal Bible promises them that it will be worth it.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

I am not a Christian, but as a Jewish person, I have always been interested in the possible historical authenticity of the Old Testament.  In my reading over the years, I have learned that many cultures have "creation stories" that include a great flood, and that there is some geographical and archaeological evidence to suggest that there may have been a major flood in that area of the world.  But I agree with the previous posts that belief in the literal words of the Bible is not a prerequisite for being a good Christian, Jew, or member of most religions.  The point of religion, I believe, is to help us be better people, people who act humanely, ethically, and respectfully toward others.  

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

There is a difference between fact and truth. Facts can reveal truth, but symbols and parables can also reveal truth, even though they are not factual. Some Christians accept the Bible literally, viewing everything in it as factual.. Some interpret many stories in the Bible figuratively but still believe in the underlying truth of them. Christians can interpret the Bible literally or figuratively and still discover the same truth. I don't think one has to accept every Bible story literally in order to follow the Christian faith. Faith really is a personal journey.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

There is a saying that many young people learn in youth groups and sports teams: “I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me.” In order to believe that Noah could accomplish his incredible achievement, I think it is necessary for a Christian to believe that God can give a person everything necessary to do what God calls him or her to do. I look at the Great Pyramids of Egypt and other ancient structures, and it is almost impossible to believe that they could be constructed without modern technology, but they were. I can’t tell you what to believe, all I can do is discuss the Christian faith underpinnings of belief. You will need to make your own decision. Good luck with your faith journey and remember that struggles make us stronger.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team

We’ll help your grades soar

Start your 48-hour free trial and unlock all the summaries, Q&A, and analyses you need to get better grades now.

  • 30,000+ book summaries
  • 20% study tools discount
  • Ad-free content
  • PDF downloads
  • 300,000+ answers
  • 5-star customer support
Start your 48-Hour Free Trial