Is belief in the creator reasonable?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

I do think that belief in a creator is reasonable.  After all, life is miraculous.  To imagine that everything happened coincidentally is probably just as outrageous and farfetched as to imagine that there was some kind of intelligent design behind all life.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Is it fair and sensible to accept the existence of God?  If one so chooses. Because all individuals have a different sense of what is fair and sensible, or in what they believe, they can choose to accept or choose not to accept.

Belief is not fact, but if someone accepts belief as fact, if someone asserts God exists, then so be it.  if someone does not accept belief as fact, if someone asserts God doesn't exist, then also, so be it.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Reason and faith are notoriously uncomfortable bedfellows, and I would have to come down on the side of those who say that they are incompatible. The existence of a deity, afterlife, divine justice, etc. can be neither proved nor disproved by evidence. I would say, though, that it's not unreasonable in the sense that we usually use the word today. In fact, there is a logic to some people's religious beliefs, as the previous post demonstrates. But reason in the strictest sense is usually connected philosophically to scientific inquiry, and inasmuch as religious beliefs are untestable, they aren't reasonable.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The idea of a creator may be reasonable to some and not others; it is an opinion and open for you to decide what you believe in.

My opinion is yes, there is a creator.  While some people tend to believe that science and religion are two contradicting subjects, I beg to differ.  There has to be some creator, or source of power, that has created all of the atoms in the universe.  I don't believe it is simply a coincidence that the laws of nature were able to create the stars, planets, and other objects in our universe.  I don't think it was a coincidence that the conditions on earth were made so that living things could exist.  And I don't think it was a coincidence that certain chemical components were able to come together and actually form the beginning of life on earth, and evolve and adapt in ways become the advanced organisms we humans are today.  It can't simply be by chance that all of this has happened in my mind; there has to be a greater power, some sort of creator to have had these events that have led up to life as we experience it today.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

This is, of course, a matter of opinion.  My own feeling is that it is reasonable, though there are many who think that it is not.

My thinking is that science can explain many things, but it can never explain where the universe itself comes from.  We can believe that evolution led to the rise of human beings or that the Big Bang led to the creation of the universe.  But science cannot tell us where the matter that caused the Big Bang came from.  Because that sort of thing remains unexplainable through science, it is at least reasonable to believe that there is a creator god who is responsible for the existence of the universe.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team

We’ll help your grades soar

Start your 48-hour free trial and unlock all the summaries, Q&A, and analyses you need to get better grades now.

  • 30,000+ book summaries
  • 20% study tools discount
  • Ad-free content
  • PDF downloads
  • 300,000+ answers
  • 5-star customer support
Start your 48-Hour Free Trial