2 Answers | Add Yours
Atticus has known since the day he took the case that the defense of Tom Robinson was not winnable. He tells his brother Jack (in Chapter 9) that
"The jury couldn't possibly be expected to take Tom Robinson's word agains the Ewells'--"
The case boils down to Tom's word against that of Mayella and Bob Ewell. Although the Ewells are the "disgrace of Maycomb," they are white and Tom is black, and in 1930s Alabama, the word of a white person is always believed over that of a black person.
There is actually a double meaning in Atticus' "black and white" statement. In one sense, he means that the case is "cut and dried": The facts seem obvious. Atticus has seemingly proved that Mayella's attacker must have been left-handed (as is Bob Ewell), and Tom's left arm is crippled. Bob and Mayella's testimony conflicts with one another, and Mayella changed her story several times while on the witness stand. Tom seems to tell his story truthfully and his testimony seems plausible; the Ewells' testimony does not. But, as Atticus knows, the trial all boils down to a white woman charging a black man with rape, and even Atticus can't convince this jury to be colorblind in this case.
Atticus is saying that the case boils down to racial (black and white) factors alone
We’ve answered 318,975 questions. We can answer yours, too.Ask a question