Would the people of the Indian subcontinent have been better off if they had attained independence as one country, rather that two?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Many of the ethnic struggles and civil wars in former colonial areas can be traced to the fact that during the colonial period, European nations drew up territorial lines without regard to ethnicity, which often placed people with longstanding hostilities and other differences under the same governments. What is more,...

Unlock
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Start your 48-Hour Free Trial

Many of the ethnic struggles and civil wars in former colonial areas can be traced to the fact that during the colonial period, European nations drew up territorial lines without regard to ethnicity, which often placed people with longstanding hostilities and other differences under the same governments. What is more, European powers usually privileged one ethnic group over the others, or even created ethnic differences through their policies (e.g. the Hutu and Tutsi in Rwanda). Once the European power left, the tensions exploded, because often the borders remained the same as during the colonial era. By dividing, India and Pakistan avoided this problem, to the extent that it was possible. So I don't think a unified subcontinent would have been a viable option.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

I've never heard of Italy referred to as a subcontinent.  If you are talking about India, I agree with the post above.  Since the split was amongst cultural lines, it probably saved a lot of internal strife and dissension.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

I don't think so.  I think that if they had become independent as one country, they would have ended up as two (or three as it is now) any way.  The split of Pakistan and Bangladesh indicates to me that the various parts of the subcontinent were not really likely to stay together.  Better to become independent as two than to have to split up.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team