The House of Wisdom

by Jonathan Lyons
Start Free Trial

After reading parts 1 and 2 of The House of Wisdom, reflect on the contrast that Lyons has drawn. What cultural explanations exist for the difference between the Arab and Western worlds? How does the evidence either support or contradict the argument that Lyons is making?

In the first two parts of The House of Wisdom, the author examines attitudes toward knowledge and religion to find cultural explanations for the difference between the Arab and Western worlds. He contrasts Muslim and Christian attitudes toward the search for knowledge. Muslim ideas often regarded intellectual pursuits as consistent with theology, while Christian societies tended to separate secular and sacred worldviews.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

In The House of Wisdom , the author uses the first two parts to lay out similarities and differences between religious influences on knowledge and culture. Viewing the differences as more significant, Johnathan Lyons emphasizes the contrast between Islamic and Christian influences as the foundation of subsequent differences between the...

See
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

In The House of Wisdom, the author uses the first two parts to lay out similarities and differences between religious influences on knowledge and culture. Viewing the differences as more significant, Johnathan Lyons emphasizes the contrast between Islamic and Christian influences as the foundation of subsequent differences between the Arab and Western worlds. Lyons explores the ways that Islam gained ascendancy over much of the territory that classical civilizations had once dominated. In the Muslim-ruled societies, a variety of intellectual pursuits were increasingly tolerated and even embraced as consistent with religious beliefs and teachings.

In the Western and Northern European territories, however, which had Christian (for many centuries synonymous with Catholic) theocracies, there was a strong tendency to separate secular and sacred worldviews. This meant that science was treated as a distinct realm of inquiry that was often regarded with suspicion, because of the perceived threat to Church orthodoxy.

Although it may seem that Lyons has exaggerated this contrast, he profiles specific places and situations where increases in knowledge—especially in mathematics and the sciences—grew much faster in Muslim societies. One prominent example was the “House of Wisdom” that operated in Baghdad (contemporary Iraq) under the Abbasid caliphate. Lyons shows how Western society, in part through contacts during the Crusades, later benefitted from the advanced knowledge developed in such fields as astronomy and biology.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team