In her 1935 essay "Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies," Margaret Mead shares her findings following her research on the cultural construction of gender in three different indigenous cultures of Papua New Guinea. In her research, she encountered varying gender roles across all three cultures. For example, in the...
See
This Answer NowStart your subscription to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
In her 1935 essay "Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies," Margaret Mead shares her findings following her research on the cultural construction of gender in three different indigenous cultures of Papua New Guinea. In her research, she encountered varying gender roles across all three cultures. For example, in the Arapesh culture, she found members of both sexes enacting maternal gender roles as parents. In contrast, the people of the Mundugumor were more aggressive and sexual, taking on a traditionally more masculine role.
After detailing her findings, Mead concludes that so-called "personality differences between the sexes" are not innate to the biology of humans, but are conditioned by society and passed down from generation to generation. Rather than asking questions about the individual culture's specific gender roles and gender expression, she is more interested in exploring the reasons why these cultural differences in gender exist in the first place. Her question, then, becomes one concerning the malleable temperament of humans: on page three of the essay, she asks, "Are [personality traits] potentialities of all human temperaments that can be developed by different kinds of social conditioning and which will not appear if the necessary conditioning is absent?" While her essay discusses culture, biology, and gender roles, Mead is largely concerned with answering questions about how a culture can shape a person to behave a certain way from infancy.