Criticism > Twentieth-Century Literary Criticism > Ruskin, John - Robert Hewison (essay date 1982)
Ruskin, John - Robert Hewison (essay date 1982)
Robert Hewison (essay date 1982)
SOURCE: "Notes on the Construction of The Stones of Venice," in Studies in Ruskin: Essays in Honor of Van Akin Burd, edited by Robert Rhodes and Del Ivan Janick, Ohio University Press, 1982, pp. 131-50.
[In the following essay, Hewison analyzes The Stones of Venice in terms of the politics, economics, and religious beliefs of the mid-1800s.]
The Stones of Venice is arguably Ruskin's most successful work. It is also arguably his most important. It is the only one of his books for which he had a predetermined plan, a plan that he largely carried out. It is the only major work in which he began by saying what he was going to say and then, with minor qualifications, said it. Anyone reading Chapter 1 of Volume I, "The Quarry," cannot, if he or she is at all familiar with the works of Ruskin, fail to be struck by the way in which he firmly states his purpose and makes his...
[The entire page is 7621 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Audrey Williamson (essay date 1976)
- Marc Shell (essay date 1978)
- John Dixon Hunt (essay date 1982)
- Robert Hewison (essay date 1982)
- Francis G. Townsend (essay date 1982)
- Richard L. Stein (essay date 1985)
- Anthony Hecht (essay date 1985)
- Dinah Birch (essay date 1988)
- Brian Maidment (essay date 1988)
- Timothy Peltason (essay date 1990)
- Richard Dellamora (essay date 1990)
- Paul Sawyer (essay date 1990)
- Sheila Emerson (essay date 1991)
- E. H. Gombrich (essay date 1991)
- David C. Hanson (essay date 1993)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
