Criticism > Twentieth-Century Literary Criticism > Ruskin, John - Brian Maidment (essay date 1988)
Ruskin, John - Brian Maidment (essay date 1988)
Brian Maidment (essay date 1988)
SOURCE: "Reading Ruskin and Ruskin Readers," in PN Review, Vol. 14, No. 5, 1988, pp. 50-3.
[In the following essay, Maidment suggests that Ruskin's importance lies in how his ideas have been understood, as well as in his large—but largely unread—oeuvre.]
Reading books about Ruskin always makes me wonder if anyone ever reads, or ever read, Ruskin's own books. His cultural presence has always been something more than that of a producer of texts. Beyond being an author he has always been a rallying place for a whole variety of heterodox social views, many of them unsanctioned by any conceivable reading of his works, and the owner of a proud and sad biography which is only just becoming available for a relatively fair interpretation. So Ruskin the cultural icon constantly obtrudes on Ruskin the writer and Ruskin the man.
Even the evidence of precisely how and where Ruskin has been read...
[The entire page is 3200 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Audrey Williamson (essay date 1976)
- Marc Shell (essay date 1978)
- John Dixon Hunt (essay date 1982)
- Robert Hewison (essay date 1982)
- Francis G. Townsend (essay date 1982)
- Richard L. Stein (essay date 1985)
- Anthony Hecht (essay date 1985)
- Dinah Birch (essay date 1988)
- Brian Maidment (essay date 1988)
- Timothy Peltason (essay date 1990)
- Richard Dellamora (essay date 1990)
- Paul Sawyer (essay date 1990)
- Sheila Emerson (essay date 1991)
- E. H. Gombrich (essay date 1991)
- David C. Hanson (essay date 1993)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
