Criticism > Twentieth-Century Literary Criticism > Dracula, Bram Stoker - Ken Gelder (essay date 1994)
Dracula, Bram Stoker - Ken Gelder (essay date 1994)
Ken Gelder (essay date 1994)
SOURCE: Gelder, Ken. “Reading Dracula.” In Reading the Vampire, pp. 65-85. London: Routledge, 1994.
[In the following essay, Gelder elucidates various critical interpretations of Dracula.]
Few other novels have been read so industriously as Bram Stoker's Dracula. Indeed, a veritable ‘academic industry’ has built itself around this novel, growing exponentially in recent years and, in effect, canonising a popular novel which might otherwise have been dismissed as merely ‘sensationalist’. To enable its canonisation (a process to which this chapter contributes), Dracula has become a highly productive piece of writing: or rather, it has become productive through its consumption. To read this novel is to consume the object itself, Dracula, and, at the same time, to produce new knowledges, interpretations, different Draculas. Paul O'Flinn has noted, in his article...
[The entire page is 10267 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Spectator (review date 31 July 1897)
- Bacil F. Kirtley (essay date fall 1956)
- Joseph S. Bierman (essay date summer 1972)
- Carrol L. Fry (essay date fall 1972)
- Seymour Shuster (essay date September 1973)
- Judith Weissman (essay date July 1977)
- Phyllis A. Roth (essay date 1982)
- Alan P. Johnson (essay date 1984)
- David Seed (essay date June 1985)
- Clive Leatherdale (essay date 1985)
- S. L. Varnado (essay date 1987)
- Ken Gelder (essay date 1994)
- Stephan Schaffrath (essay date spring 2002)
- Christopher Herbert (essay date summer 2002)
- Dennis Foster (essay date 2002)
- Gregory Castle (essay date 2002)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
