Criticism > Twentieth-Century Literary Criticism > Dracula, Bram Stoker - David Seed (essay date June 1985)
Dracula, Bram Stoker - David Seed (essay date June 1985)
David Seed (essay date June 1985)
SOURCE: Seed, David. “The Narrative Method of Dracula.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 40, no. 1 (June 1985): 61-75.
[In the following essay, Seed provides a stylistic analysis of Dracula.]
When Bram Stoker's Dracula first appeared in 1897, it was greeted with a chorus of acclaim for its power from the reviewers. One dissenting voice was that of the Athenaeum, which charged the novel with structural weakness:
Dracula is highly sensational, but it is wanting in the constructive art as well as in the higher literary sense. It reads at times like a mere series of grotesquely incredible events; but there are better moments that show more power.1
This aloof dismissal seems to have established a consensus attitude toward the novel that has met with an almost complete critical silence. Only of recent years have critics begun to...
[The entire page is 5795 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Spectator (review date 31 July 1897)
- Bacil F. Kirtley (essay date fall 1956)
- Joseph S. Bierman (essay date summer 1972)
- Carrol L. Fry (essay date fall 1972)
- Seymour Shuster (essay date September 1973)
- Judith Weissman (essay date July 1977)
- Phyllis A. Roth (essay date 1982)
- Alan P. Johnson (essay date 1984)
- David Seed (essay date June 1985)
- Clive Leatherdale (essay date 1985)
- S. L. Varnado (essay date 1987)
- Ken Gelder (essay date 1994)
- Stephan Schaffrath (essay date spring 2002)
- Christopher Herbert (essay date summer 2002)
- Dennis Foster (essay date 2002)
- Gregory Castle (essay date 2002)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
