Readers and critics alike at times feel frustrated with Henry James’s What Maisie Knew, the careful, detailed record of the emergence of a young girl’s consciousness. James scholars are still puzzled over why the artist turned a serious novel over to such an apparently unsophisticated protagonist, and some have wondered whether a complex, realistic social satire can be communicated through a medium who does not understand much of what she sees. Critics are equally perplexed at the moral ambiguity around which the plot of the novel revolves, an uncertainty the novel’s disturbing conclusion does nothing to dispel. Such responses are probably inevitable, for What Maisie Knew seems to have escaped even the control of its author.
Written during a period of artistic transition for James, the novel is a strange mixture of the kind of masterful storytelling that characterizes such early works as Washington Square (1880) and the psychological complexity of later masterworks such as The Golden Bowl (1904). Perhaps the transitional aspect of the novel is best illustrated by the fact that James himself was not sure how long the manuscript should be. He originally conceived the work as a short story in which a young innocent is victimized by adults whose motives she cannot hope to fathom. The detailed notebooks James kept during the process of planning the story show that the idea grew steadily in James’s imagination....
(The entire section is 1067 words.)
Want to Read More?
Subscribe now to read the rest of What Maisie Knew Critical Essays. Plus get complete access to 30,000+ study guides!