Legacy and Criticisms
Durkheim is always named with Max Weber as one of the founders of sociology, and the concerns of these three essays are central to his whole project. In studying sociology, one studies the whole universe, the many aspects of which “converge in society” to create new and richer syntheses. “In a word, society is nature arrived at a higher point in its development, concentrating all its energies to surpass, as it were, itself.” Sociology, then, has the noblest goals, and these three essays—even when making the most arbitrary proclamations—often impress with their perception and manner of formulation. However, their core of sociological science remains evasive, always blurred by Durkheim’s postulation of some entity that he maintains is not metaphysical even though he “see[s] in the Divinity only society transfigured and symbolically expressed.”
Scholars have viewed the attack on epiphenomenalism in “Individual and Collective Representations” as weak and uninformed, lacking a convincing account of the mind-body relationship. Exactly a hundred years after Durkheim’s dismissal in 1898 of William James’s remarks on memory, neuroscientists at Harvard and Stanford used magnetic resonance imaging to focus on the prefrontal lobes and the parahippocampal cortex as crucial to good memory, basically negating Durkheim’s thought. In “The Determination of Moral Facts,” Durkheim admits to being criticized for a theory of morality that...
(The entire section is 332 words.)
Show us the love and view this for free! Use the facebook like button, or any other share button on this page, and get this content free!free!
Want to Read More?
Subscribe now to read the rest of Sociology and Philosophy Critical Essays. Plus get complete access to 30,000+ study guides!