Slavery and Social Death is not a history of slavery, and despite its attention to statistical data, it is more interpretive than empirical. Historians have had difficulty with some of Patterson’s uses of historical records and have noted that some of his historical evidence has been taken out of context.
Patterson is mostly interested in the process and meaning of slavery, not its substance. In this respect, his approach is essentially sociological. He borrows elements of Marxist theory and adopts models from symbolic anthropology. Ultimately, though, Patterson structures his argument along the lines of Émile Durkheim’s classic sociological study Le Suicide: étude de sociologie (Suicide: A Study in Sociology, 1951).
The author cogently puts slavery into worldwide perspective. He demonstrates effectively that slavery is not a “peculiar institution.” It has existed from the dawn of human history and seems to have thrived in those areas and periods of the world where it would least be expected. Patterson points out that slavery was the base of the economic structures in ancient Greece and Rome and explores the association between high civilization and slavery. His bold assertion that Rome’s reliance on slavery has been unsurpassed by any other society’s casts new light on previous perspectives on the rise of so-called Western civilization.
The author’s style is dense; his narrative flow is...
(The entire section is 349 words.)
Want to Read More?
Subscribe now to read the rest of Slavery and Social Death Critical Essays. Plus get complete access to 30,000+ study guides!