The crowd makes itself known through ‘‘hideous laughter,’’ the cackling that accompanies the petty acts of revenge which the Burmese inflict on their foreign rulers. This same laughter coercively implies a choice which the narrator cannot escape— the choice between becoming the object of the mob’s disappointment and ire, or shooting the elephant, a creature which he knows ought to be left alone. The crowd is not a ‘‘Burmese crowd,’’ or even vaguely an ‘‘Asian’’ as opposed to a ‘‘European crowd’’; it is a generic crowd, behaving as all crowds do, with less and less reason the larger it grows and with an increasing taste for for venting its collective resentment against some arbitrary victim, here either the narrator himself, conspicuous because of his office, or the elephant, a convenient substitute and safer because, as a non-human, its victimage entails less possibility of reprisal.
The elephant acquires a character during the course of Orwell’s narrative, so that even though he is not human, he deserves to be mentioned. The narrator describes him as a rogue who has escaped his mahout (driver). Indian, Burmese, and Thai elephants are working animals, used for lifting and hauling. The elephant therefore has something analogous to a social station—he is a ‘‘worker‘‘—and resembles, in his servant-to-master relation the native Burmese, who have been enrolled...
(The entire section is 346 words.)
Want to Read More?
Subscribe now to read the rest of Shooting an Elephant Characters. Plus get complete access to 30,000+ study guides!