Prison Notebooks Essay - Critical Essays

Antonio Gramsci


Since Gramsci is considered by many to be one of the seminal political thinkers of his time, a genius of sorts, interpretations of Gramsci’s Prison Notebooks must begin with an understanding of the author’s own singular cultural view of himself and of the society with which he was most directly familiar.

To be sure, Gramsci was Italian, but despite the unification of 1866, Italy’s cultural divisions and distinctions had deep and ancient roots. Gramsci was a Sardinian, about as Italian as the Irish, Scottish, or Welsh were English, as Corsicans were French, or as Basques were Spanish. The inhabitants of Sardinia, which had resisted one invader after another through its history, are traditionally tough, laconic, and self-analytical members of a closed folk society who saw themselves as outsiders and whose heroes were rebels and outlaws. Gramsci, who possessed these characteristics himself, became a leading folklorist of his native Sardinia. Indeed, his ideas on how popular culture shapes social structure and class relationships would profoundly affect the intellectuals of his time. Even if Gramsci had never embraced Marxism, he would have opposed the political and social structure that had been imposed upon the Sardinians and their culture.

In the years just prior to his imprisonment, as a leader of the Italian Communist Party Gramsci sided with the Joseph Stalin/Nikolay Bukharin majority in the Communist Party against Leon Trotsky and the so-called left. The thrust of his critical attack was that the Russian Communist Party was tearing itself apart while being callously unmindful of its responsibilities to the international proletariat (working classes) whom it was obliged to help liberate. By the time of his arrest, therefore, he was as much in danger of extermination by Stalin as he was by Mussolini’s Fascists.

The notebooks are the work of a gifted, learned, and independent thinker. Gramsci sharply reminded the Russian leadership that Party unity and discipline could not be coerced; unity and discipline, he thought, must emanate from genuine loyalty and conviction. He held, too, that even the enemies of Joseph Stalin had played important, positive, and instructive roles in the party’s...

(The entire section is 916 words.)