At the outset, Benedict makes a case for the careful study of primitive cultures. The arguments she presents seem unremarkable now, but at the time she was writing, many Western academicians could see no point in examining cultures far less developed than their own. Benedict addresses this short-sightedness, faulting “the white man” (her words) for not realizing that customs and cultural institutions determine the individual’s perception, and that more of human behavior is socially ingrained than is biologically determined. The principal reason for studying primitive societies, then, is that they provide case material, in a form far simpler than that offered by Western cultures, for the differentiation between culturally determined and biologically determined behavior.
The diversity of cultures, each with institutions and behaviors that often seem diametrically opposed to those of other cultures, in itself offers evidence for the weighting of the equation toward social determination. Benedict argues that there is a great arc of possible human interests and behaviors of which each culture embodies but a fraction. Indeed, a culture that included too much material would be as unintelligible and as unmanageable as a language that employed every sound possible to the human vocal apparatus. The necessity for the selection of specific behaviors and the rejection of others explains the diversity of cultures, each of which is an example of the endless...
(The entire section is 867 words.)
Want to Read More?
Subscribe now to read the rest of Patterns of Culture Critical Essays. Plus get complete access to 30,000+ study guides!