Critical Evaluation

Sinclair Lewis frequently had difficulty in determining in his own mind whether his works were meant as bitterly comic satires of American life and values or whether they were planned as complex novels centering on the lives of the characters he made famous. One of the difficulties of reading Lewis is that these two conflicting sorts of writing are both present in many of his works, and frequently at odds with each other. This is demonstrably true of Main Street. For all his satire of small-town attitudes and values, Lewis is not unequivocal in his attack. He finds a great many things of value in the best Main Street has to offer, and he seems to see Carol Kennicott’s reconciliation with the town at the end of the novel as a triumph rather than a failure on her part. Though Main Street is, as it has been frequently called, a revolt against the village, it is a revolt marked by the complexity of Lewis’s attitude toward Gopher Prairie and toward its real-life counterpart, Sauk Center, Minnesota, where Lewis spent his early years.

Lewis’s characters, particularly Will and Carol Kennicott, are other complicating factors in this novel that prevent its being simply a satire. Unlike the one-dimensional figures typical of satire, the Kennicotts develop into real people who demand the reader’s attention and sympathy. Carol in particular is developed more novelistically than satirically, as Lewis traces her development from a naïve and foolishly idealistic young women into a more tolerant and understanding human being. Readers who accept only the critical and satiric portrait of the small town that lies at the surface of Main Street would be embracing the same overly simplistic attitudes that characterized Carol at the beginning of the novel.

During the early part of the...

(The entire section is 750 words.)