In The Magic Finger, a number of overlapping concerns are addressed and valid questions are raised about significant social issues: Should hunting be allowed to occur merely for the pleasure of the hunters? Should an eight-year-old child possess, and use, a gun? What happens to animal families when one or more members are slaughtered for sport? Do humans have a greater right to attack animals than animals do to attack humans?
Although narrated in a tongue-in-cheek fashion, Dahl’s book presents a provocative look at the issue of hunting from the perspectives of a bold young female activist and the hunters’ prey—in this case, the wild ducks themselves. Thoughtful readers will be challenged to reevaluate their own thoughts on the issue because, despite the humor of the story, the question of whether hunting is morally acceptable demands attention. Dahl’s viewpoint is clear throughout the lighthearted text, at times thinly disguised in the voice of the female narrator: “It doesn’t seem right to me that men and boys should kill animals just for the fun they get out of it.” At other times, it is the dialogue between the hunters and the hunted that hints at an underlying bias of the book.“No! No! No!” called out Mr. and Mrs. Gregg, both together. “Don’t shoot! Please don’t shoot!” “Why not?” said one of the ducks. . . . “You are always shooting at us. . . . Yesterday you shot my children. . . . You shot all six...
(The entire section is 499 words.)
Want to Read More?
Subscribe now to read the rest of The Magic Finger Critical Essays. Plus get complete access to 30,000+ study guides!