In her preface, Sutcliff lists the heroic qualities on which she based her selections: Each figure “is always a great man in one way or another”; “very often is not particularly wise or good”; “is larger than life, and enlarges the lives of those who share his story”; “has a special kind of magnetism that lives on after him” and allows stories developed about other men to be attributed to him; and “very often he dies young and violently.”
According to the author, Caratacus’ decision to retreat from the Roman troops and resume fighting at a later date was “a more difficult thing for any leader than to lead them forward in victory.” Caratacus is described as a charismatic leader. Later, he must make a Delphic decision as to the item with the most importance: his captured wife and children or his continued struggle with the Romans. One part of his life did not match the heroic characteristics—he did not die young, but in exile.
King Arthur is depicted as the source for many writers, all trying to place him in their own historical periods. The author presents the literary Arthur and questions whether Arthur was somehow lost in the retellings, with Sir Lancelot emerging as the hero. Sutcliff then provides the historical basis for Arthur as well as another heroic quality—that of stories about other men being attached to him. She credits Arthur’s victory at Badon with allowing the blending of the British and Roman...
(The entire section is 921 words.)
Want to Read More?
Subscribe now to read the rest of Heroes and History Critical Essays. Plus get complete access to 30,000+ study guides!