"A Good Man Is Hard to Find," the title selection of O'Connor's 1955 collection, has received a great deal of critical attention. The story serves as an excellent introduction to O'Connor's fiction because it contains all the elements that typify O'Connor's work: a combination of humor and horror, grotesque characters, and an opportunity for characters to accept God's grace. Critics were initially intrigued with O'Connor's use of violence in her stories, uncommon for a writer—not to mention a woman—in the 1950s and 1960s, yet they recognized her ability to draw characters with clarity and detachment. These traits caused critics to categorize O'Connor as a Southern Grotesque writer, similar to William Faulkner, who also wrote critically of his Southern heritage. However, these same critics were confused by her staunch Roman Catholic perspective, which was unusual for a writer in a region that was predominantly Baptist. O'Connor thought of herself as more of an outsider: not a Southern writer because of her Catholicism, and not a Catholic writer because of her Southern roots. Because her point of view is often theological, and because she fails to present a clear, straightforward moral, the message in her stories has often been misinterpreted.
Initial reaction to "A Good Man Is Hard to Find'' was positive. Caroline Gordon wrote in The New York Times Book Review that the story was "characterized by precision, density and an almost alarming circumscription." Louis D. Rubin, Jr., in an essay entitled "Two Ladies of the South'' recognized that O'Connor "is in essence a religious writer. Knowledge of good and evil is at the heart of...
(The entire section is 673 words.)
Want to Read More?
Subscribe now to read the rest of A Good Man Is Hard to Find Critical Essays. Plus get complete access to 30,000+ study guides!