French Without Tears is a light—perhaps very light—comedy, and an analysis of its meaning should be approached with caution. It is precisely this resistance to meaning, however, that is at the heart of the play. Terence Rattigan’s expert manipulation of pace, rhythm, entrances, exits, and plot turns is often noted; indeed, Rattigan is usually seen as one of the last practitioners of the well-made play, which relied for its effect on a rather machinelike construction. In Britain the well-made play had been firmly tied to the social drama and “problem play” created by such dramatists as George Bernard Shaw, Henry Arthur Jones, and Arthur Wing Pinero. In Rattigan’s piece, however, the plot twists and the realignment of relationships among the characters defy any such social or philosophical interpretation.
Early in the play, for example, professional and romantic rivalries seem to be established: Kenneth, Kit, and Alan are preparing for an entrance exam which only one of them is likely to pass; ironically, that person is Alan, who least wants the job. Kit and Rogers quickly become rivals for Diana’s affections, along with the again reluctant Alan. Unexpectedly, any tension is quickly dispelled: The impending exam does not become a feature of the plot, and the rivalry among the men is transformed into camaraderie in response to Diana’s machinations.
It becomes apparent that Rattigan, while creating a play that is...
(The entire section is 434 words.)