Osgood, Frances Sargent
Frances Sargent Osgood 1811-1850
American poet, essayist, and children's writer. Also wrote under the pseudonyms Kate Carol, Violet Vane, and Clarice.
Acknowledged by contemporary reviewers as one of the foremost sentimental poets, Osgood represented for many the Victorian ideal of the feminine poetess who explored themes of innocence, love, and romance chiefly through floral imagery and metaphors. She also gained notoriety for a scandalous literary alliance with Edgar Allan Poe, who published and rhapsodized over many of Osgood's poems in the periodicals that he edited. While scholarly interest in Osgood's oeuvre has been largely overshadowed by the analysis of the murky details surrounding her relationship with Poe, modern critics have begun to reexamine her verses as sophisticated and witty specimens that satirically—and sometimes even erotically—address the role of women as victims in a repressive patriarchal order.
Osgood was born in Boston on June 18, 1811, to a wealthy merchant named Joseph Locke and his second wife, Mary Foster. She spent her early years in Hingham, Massachusetts. Biographers have speculated that Osgood likely received her formal education at home by private tutors, although there is a record of her attending the prestigious Boston Lyceum for Young Ladies in 1828. During this time, she also began writing poetry, some of which was published in the Boston periodical Juvenile Miscellany. In 1834, Osgood met portrait artist Samuel Stillman Osgood at the Boston Athenaeum while she was composing verses in the gallery. After a brief courtship, the two were married in 1835. Shortly after the wedding, the Osgoods traveled to London so that he could continue studying art. While there, she gave birth to their first child, Ellen. In the course of the next three years, the Osgoods became active members of London's high society. He enjoyed considerable success painting portraits for members of England's elite families and she published two poetry collections entitled A Wreath of Wild Flowers from New England (1838) and The Casket of Fate (1839). Upon returning to the United States in 1839, the Osgoods settled in Boston where she gave birth to a second daughter, May. In 1842 they moved to New York, and Osgood quickly became a prominent participant in the city's literary salons. During this period of creative stimulation, Osgood published a number of works, including The Poetry of Flowers and Flowers of Poetry (1841), Puss in Boots, and the Marquis of Carabas (1844), and The Cries of New-York (1846). She also contributed poems, essays, and short stories to such prominent periodicals as the Broadway Journal, Graham's Magazine, and The Columbian Magazine.
Just as she was embarking on a promising career as a poet and literary contributor to many respected journals, Osgood experienced tumult in her personal life. Although there is little concrete evidence documenting Osgood's marriage, most scholars have speculated that the Osgoods separated in 1844, probably due to Samuel's infidelity. The following year, Osgood met Poe at a literary soirée, and the two became good friends. The intense literary courtship between the two poets—both of whom were married at the time—played out for the public in the pages of the journals edited by Poe and fueled scandalous gossip and speculation among the New York literati. Indeed, the exact nature of Poe and Osgood's relationship has remained a mystery. While some scholars have maintained that that the association was merely a platonic, intellectual exchange of ideas, others have speculated that Osgood shrewdly manipulated the scandal to promote her own career. Still other literary historians have suggested that the two poets had a brief love affair which produced an illegitimate child named Fanny Fay in 1846. The paternity of Osgood's third child is obscured by the fact that she and Samuel reconciled during this period. Further, the Osgoods moved from New York to Philadelphia in part to distance Frances from the rumors circulating among the literary salons. The remaining years of Osgood's life were plagued by death and misfortune: in 1847 Fanny Fay died; in 1848 Osgood became ill with tuberculosis; and in 1849 Poe died and Samuel left Frances again to seek his fortune in the California gold rush. After a long and debilitating struggle with tuberculosis, Osgood died on May 12, 1850. Soon after her death, Osgood's remaining two daughters succumbed to the disease as well.
Although nineteenth-century reviewers generally esteemed the sentimental quality of Osgood's published poems, many of the verses have since been classified as cliché-ridden and mediocre examples of an artificially romantic literary tradition. Osgood's first contribution to this genre was a collection of 137 poems published in A Wreath of Wild Flowers from New England. Contemporary critics praised these verses for their innate lyricism, grace, and powerful floral imagery which compellingly evoked childlike innocence, and the uncertainty of courtship, among other related themes. Some reviewers, including Poe, singled out Osgood's blank-verse tragedy “Elfrida” as one of the most accomplished poems in the collection. The dramatic poem details a love triangle involving lust, betrayal, and ambition in which the heroine ultimately uses her bewitching beauty to become a queen. Osgood also edited and contributed poems to The Poetry of Flowers and Flowers of Poetry, a gift book containing sumptuous color plates, whimsical descriptions of botanical items, and a floral dictionary. Critics have identified this work as a seminal contribution to the popular floral dictionary genre of the mid-nineteenth century in which the physical characteristics of flowers are codified and correlated to the social and sexual mores of the day. Indeed, many sentimental poets utilized these floral dictionaries as a reference source for the metaphors and images in their own poetry. Osgood's next major verse collection, Poems (1846), is generally considered a conventional examination of idealized love and romance; but some critics have suggested that the poet also reveals a more mature perspective on relationships, pessimistically focusing on betrayal, hypocrisy, and the painful aspects of love. Osgood's last major collection, also entitled Poems (1850), contains many new poems which explore the nature of womanhood in both idealistic and ironic terms. More than in her earlier works, Osgood here displays a conscious struggle to come to terms with the conflicting expectations and values associated with feminine behavior within a masculine social hierarchy. Many critics have contended that Osgood's increasingly rebellious poetic voice was not necessarily the result of artistic maturation; rather, the poet demonstrated such a capacity in many of the unpublished, privately circulated poems throughout her literary career. Indeed, in the poems which she read for literary salons but which she deemed improper for publication, Osgood unconventionally explored romantic relationships and feminine stereotypes, demonstrating a facility for sophisticated rhetorical constructs, a subversive predilection for satirical caricatures, and a worldly knowledge of erotic love.
Osgood was one of the foremost literary celebrities of the 1840s, both for the publication of her poems in the popular magazines of the day and for her sensationalized association with Poe. Critics have been dubious about whether or not Poe really admired Osgood's poetry, despite the fact that he oversaw the publication of a number of her verses in the periodicals that he edited. In his own words, Poe praised Osgood in 1846 as an artist who is “ardent, sensitive, impulsive; the very soul of truth and honor; a worshiper of the beautiful, with a heart so radically artless as to seem abundant in art—universally respected, admired and beloved.” But critics such as John Reilly have pointed out that effusive assessments such as these about Osgood's overall artistry also reveal a certain degree or circumspection or ambiguity about the poems themselves. According to Reilly, “Poe wrote of Mrs. Osgood with great enthusiasm, but did so in terms which were unwittingly, or perhaps tacitly, an admission of her genuine mediocrity.” For the remainder of the nineteenth century and for much of the twentieth century, critical interest in the nature of Osgood's relationship to Poe dominated any substantial analysis of her oeuvre. However, towards the end of the twentieth century, commentators began to assess the literary merits of Osgood's poetry as part of a broader reexamination of women writers in the nineteenth century. While most literary scholars have acknowledged that Osgood was a driving force behind the sentimental literature movement that produced highly conventional and clichéd love poetry, they also have maintained that she had no choice but to write within the narrow stylistic confines dictated by conservative Victorian notions of feminine propriety. Some critics have noted, however, that Osgood also privately circulated and recited poems at salon meetings which defied social convention and playfully satirized the very social and moral standards which she gamely upheld to become a published poet. As Joanne Dobson has written, “[although] Osgood did write in the ‘angelic’ or high sentimental mode, she also wrote in a mode of sheer mischief, destabilizing the underlying premises of the sentimental ethos—especially as it attends to relationships between the sexes—and wittily investigating in a most unangelic manner the play of eroticism and social forms.” For her part, Elizabeth Petrino has analyzed Osgood's exploration of sex and gender roles in the context of the numerous floral dictionaries which proliferated in the mid-nineteenth century. Focusing on The Poetry of Flowers and Flowers of Poetry, Petrino has demonstrated how Osgood subversively employed floral definitions to critique rigid Victorian sex roles, to undercut socially defined behaviors, and to satirize the patriarchal subjugation of women.
A Wreath of Wild Flowers from New England (poetry) 1838
The Casket of Fate (poetry) 1839
The Poetry of Flowers and Flowers of Poetry: To Which are Added, a Simple Treatise on Botany, with Familiar Examples, and a Copious Floral Dictionary [editor and contributor] (poetry, handbook) 1841
The Snow-Drop: A New-Year's Gift for Children (juvenilia) 1842
Puss in Boots, and the Marquis of Carabas, Rendered into Verse (juvenilia) 1844
The Flower Alphabet, in Gold and Colors (poetry) 1845
The Cries of New-York (poetry) 1846
Poems (poetry) 1846
The Floral Offering, a Token of Friendship [editor and contributor] (poetry, handbook) 1847
A Letter about the Lions, Addressed to Mabel in the Country (poetry) 1849
Poems (poetry) 1850; revised as Osgood's Poetical Works, Containing a Choice Selection of Sacred and Miscellaneous Poems (poetry) n.d.
(The entire section is 122 words.)
SOURCE: Poe, Edgar A. “The Literati of New York City.” Godey's Magazine and Lady's Book 33 (July-December 1846): 127-29.
[In the following essay, Poe provides an overview of Osgood's poems, praising them for their grace, energy, and charm.]
Mrs. Frances Sargent Osgood, for the last two or three years, has been rapidly attaining distinction—and this, evidently, with no effort at attaining it. She seems, in fact, to have no object in view beyond that of giving voice to the feelings or to the fancies of the moment. “Necessity,” says the proverb, “is the mother of Invention;” and the invention of Mrs. O., at least, springs plainly from necessity—from the necessity of invention. Not to write poetry—not to think it, dream it, act it, and be it, is entirely out of her power.
It may be questioned whether, with more method, more industry, more definite purpose, more ambition, Mrs. Osgood would have made a more decided impression on the public mind. She might, upon the whole, have written better poems, but the chances are that she would have failed in conveying so vivid and so just an idea of her powers as poet. The warm abandonnement of her style—that charm which now so captivates—is but a portion and a consequence of her unworldly nature, of her disregard of mere fame; but it affords us glimpses (which we could not otherwise have obtained) of a capacity for...
(The entire section is 3104 words.)
SOURCE: Reilly, John E. “Mrs. Osgood and The Broadway Journal.” Duquesne Review 12, no. 2 (fall 1967): 131-44.
[In the following essay, Reilly explores how Osgood exploited the “melodramatic potentialities” of her literary courtship with Edgar Allan Poe to advance her career as a poet.]
Among the legends surrounding Edgar Allan Poe, one of the most enduring and certainly one of the most sensational is that he was a great lover, a kind of indigenous Casanova whose Lenores, Ligeias, and Annabel Lees are but the sallow surrogates of a host of warmblooded realities with whom Poe had consorted. Like most legends, this one has some basis in fact, remote through it happens to be. Poe did court the favor of the female sex, as it was called in his day; he did assume the romantic posture of the gallant; and he did enjoy the attentions of certain ladies, especially those of a literary cast. Almost without exception, however, his affairs of the heart reached either seriocomic or pathetic conclusions, and little evidence has ever been adduced that any of them achieved proportions sufficient to substantiate the legend.
Poe's relationship with Frances Sargent Osgood is one of the historical bases upon which the legend rests. Sentimental poetess and wife of a New York portrait artist, Mrs. Osgood met Poe for the first time in March of 1845. He had accepted some of her verse for...
(The entire section is 5683 words.)
SOURCE: Dobson, Joanne. “Sex, Wit, and Sentiment: Frances Osgood and the Poetry of Love.” American Literature 65, no. 4 (December 1993): 631-46.
[In the following essay, Dobson surveys Osgood's published and unpublished poetry, asserting that Osgood was a provocative and witty commentator on the highly codified sexual attitudes of her day.]
Preserved in the archives of the American Antiquarian Society is an intriguing literary artifact: a miniature slate—three by three and three-quarters inches—upon which is barely discernible the final written word of the popular nineteenth-century American poet Frances Sargent Osgood (1811-1850). That word is “angel.” According to the accompanying envelope, Osgood addressed this communication to her husband, the portrait artist Samuel Stillman Osgood, on her deathbed after the power of speech had failed her. This minor—indeed, virtually unknown—oddity of American literary history may well constitute a self-consciously constructed sentimental artifact. Without cynicism I suggest that leaving behind the word “angel” as her final written utterance might well have seemed to Osgood—as she succumbed to tuberculosis at the age of thirty-eight—an appropriately final inscription by the woman poet of an appropriately sentimental final image.1 And certainly it seemed so to her family and heirs; the slate was carefully preserved by the family and...
(The entire section is 7516 words.)
SOURCE: Petrino, Elizabeth A. “‘Silent Eloquence’: The Social Codification of Floral Metaphors in the Poems of Frances Sargent Osgood and Emily Dickinson.” Legacy 15, no. 2 (1998): 139-54.
[In the following essay, Petrino discusses how Osgood and Dickinson used the floral metaphors in their poetry to criticize rigid mid-nineteenth-century social and sexual attitudes.]
The expression of this divine passion ought to be divine also, and it was to illustrate this fact that flowers were ingeniously made emblematical of our most delicate sentiments; they do, in fact, utter in “silent eloquence” a language better than writing; they are the delicate symbols of the illusions of a tender heart and of a lively and brilliant imagination.
Frances Sargent Osgood, The Poetry of Flowers, and Flowers of Poetry
You ask me what my flowers said—then they were disobedient—I gave them messages.
Emily Dickinson (L 187)1
“Let me thank the little Cousin in flowers, which without lips, have language—” wrote Emily Dickinson to Eugenia Hall in 1885 (L 1002). For Dickinson, as for her contemporaries, flowers were repositories of cultural meaning and communicated emotions privately. During the 1840s and 1850s, popular female writers were adding to a...
(The entire section is 10627 words.)
SOURCE: De Jong, Mary. “‘Read Here Thy Name Concealed’: Frances Osgood's Poems on Parting with Edgar Allan Poe.” Poe Studies 32, nos. 1-2 (1999): 27-36.
[In the following essay, De Jong analyzes the circumstances surrounding the termination of Osgood's literary relationship with Edgar Allan Poe and maintains that the two maintained a cryptic intratextual communication after their separation.]
Introduced to Edgar Allan Poe in a drawing room in New York's Astor House in early March 1845, Frances Sargent Osgood soon became his friend and favorite American woman poet. Later that month she proudly reported to a friend Poe's praise of her work in a recent lecture on American poets: “& he did not know me then,” she wrote. “I was introduced to him afterwards—& like him very much.”1 The Osgood-Poe relationship grew increasingly complex as they enjoyed one another's company at salons, smaller private parties, and the Poes' home, exchanged letters, and published compliments to one another. In early 1846 Elizabeth F. Ellet, another member of New York's literary coteries, saw one of Osgood's letters to Poe. Choosing to construe it as incriminating, Ellet persuaded Mrs. Osgood to recall her correspondence. Margaret Fuller and Anne C. Lynch were dispatched on that awkward errand. In handing over the letters, Poe angrily called Osgood's self-appointed protectors...
(The entire section is 11888 words.)
Walker, Cheryl. “Frances Sargent Osgood (1811-1850).” In American Women Poets of the Nineteenth Century, edited by Cheryl Walker, pp. 106-107. New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press, 1992.
Provides a brief critical introduction to Osgood and reprints a number of poems.
———. “Frances Osgood: 1811-1850.” Legacy 1, no. 2 (fall 1984): 5-6
Profiles Osgood's life and literary career.
De Jong, Mary G. “Lines from a Partly Published Drama: The Romance of Frances Sargent Osgood and Edgar Allan Poe.” In Patrons and Protégées: Gender, Friendship, and Writing in Nineteenth-Century America, edited by Shirley Marchalonis, pp. 31-58. New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press, 1988.
Characterizes Osgood and Poe as “mutual admirers and literary allies,” but refuses to speculate on a physical love affair due to insufficient evidence.
Dobson, Joanne. “Reclaiming Sentimental Literature.” American Literature 69, no. 2 (June 1997): 263-88.
Surveys the mid-nineteenth-century sentimental literature movement, focusing on Osgood's “The Little Hand” as an example of the keepsake tradition in sentimental poetry.
Pollin, Burton P. “Poe and Frances Osgood, as Linked...
(The entire section is 308 words.)