F. Scott Fitzgerald Essay - Critical Essays

Analysis

Despite showing his subject in all of his complexities, Greenfeld is a moralist who clearly disapproves of the decadent life-style of Fitzgerald. Moreover, throughout the book, he depicts Fitzgerald as an utter failure: as a football player, as a socialite, as a war hero—after receiving basic training he was not sent to Europe—and as a husband and father. Yet, despite this didactic tone—one clearly directed at teenage readers—Greenfeld manages to moralize without condescension, even when describing some of the bizarre and tasteless pranks for which the Fitzgeralds became famous. While it is generally the custom to find in the idiosyncrasies of the rich and famous only evidence of their charmed uniqueness, Greenfeld, implicitly rejecting this basically amoral stance, shakes his head sympathetically but in disapproval.

As befits a literary biography, the works of Fitzgerald are given a more than cursory examination. It might even be said that Greenfeld’s treatment of the subject stands up well as an introduction to Fitzgerald the author. Simple expositions, simple explanations, and simple elucidations—all these features characterize this exemplary work. The literary judgments rendered by Greenfeld, however, are the hand-me-downs of prevailing critical opinion. For example, he says of Fitzgerald’s first novel—widely praised at the time of its publication in 1920 and even given the seal of approval by H. L. Mencken—that despite its daring,...

(The entire section is 551 words.)