Eutropius fl. c. 320-c. 387
A high-ranking official in the governments of several Roman emperors, Eutropius wrote what was for centuries considered one of the standard Roman histories. Written for the emperor Valens in 369 or 370, Eutropius's Breviarium ab Urbe Condita (Compendium of Roman History) summarizes the history of Rome, particularly chronicling its military and political concerns from its founding in 753 B.C. to 364 A.D. Although the book has been somewhat neglected in the twentieth century, it has influenced generations of historians and is still used today to supplement Roman republican and imperial history.
Most of what can be constructed of Eutropius's biography has been garnered from secondary references to Eutropius, for he says very little about himself in the Breviarium. While critics disagree on the accuracy of these secondary attributions, it is generally accepted that he was born in Italy or in the province of Asia soon after 320, for he was a contemporary of the Emperor Valens (b. 328?) and Julian (b. 331). Eutropius's parents were probably quite wealthy but not of senatorial rank, for although Eutropius was well-educated, service in the imperial secretariat was generally pursued by curiales, members of the middle class. His career in the Eastern bureaucracy makes it likely that he studied Greek and law, probably in Rome, where students from throughout the empire gathered.
Soon after 340 he gained entry into the imperial secretariats, beginning his career as a clerk under Constantius in the eastern section of the Secretary of State for Correspondence (magister epistularum). When Constantius died in 361, Julian became sole emperor; he shortly afterward formed an investigatory committee that led to the banishment of six high government officials and the execution of five others. Eutropius must have been cleared of any wrongdoing, for he later accompanied Julian on the Persian campaign in 363 and was among the military and court officials to choose Julian's successor when he died in that same year. Julian was succeeded by Jovian and later Valentinian, during which time Eutropius continued to serve as a senior official. Some time afterward Eutropius was taken on in the administration of the Eastern Emperor Valens, brother of Valentinian; in his Breviarium he claims to have accompanied Valens in 367-69 in his campaign against the Goths.
A promotion to the senior post of Secretary of State for General Petitions (magister memoriae) under Valens followed in 369. Eutropius wrote the Breviarium in that year or the next, possibly to show his gratitude to Valens for his promotion to the most important of the three Secretariats. Eutropius then became proconsul of Asia from 371 to 372, a position through which he had direct access to the Emperor; while in this position, Eutropius received a constitution on the restoration of the cities to Asia of part of their civic lands and restored buildings at Magnesia. Although he was later implicated in a plot against Valens, for which he was brought to Antioch on the charge of complicity, Eutropius probably was exonerated, for he escaped the many executions—of guilty and innocent alike—that followed. Nonetheless, he was removed from the proconsulship.
When Valentinian died in 375, followed by Valens in 378, the succession of Gratian and Theodosius marked Eutropius's return to political life. Sometime after 372 Eutropius travelled to Rome and was accepted in the court of Gracian; he was installed as prefect of Illyricum under Theodosius from 380 to 381, during which time Eutropius influenced the establishment of many laws, some of which lessened the punishment for various crimes. After concluding his prefecture in late 381, he moved to Constantinople, continuing to enjoy the approval of the Emperor Theodosius, who elected him Eastern consul in 387.
Eutropius's only extant work is the Breviarium. Working primarily from source materials, including an abridgement of Livy's Epitome, Suetonius auctus, and what is known as Enmann's Kaisergeschichte, the book covers the whole of Roman history "from the founding of the city" (ab urbe condita) in 753 B.C. to the death of Jovian in 364 A.D., and was probably commissioned by Valens so that he, Valentinian, and the military commanders could acquire a sound knowledge of Roman history, which was demanded of them by the senatorial aristocracy. The history may also have been intended to bolster support of Valens's aggressive foreign policy against the Persians, which he undertook in order to recover the land surrendered by Jovian. Although the Breviarium's ten short books are primarily concerned with the most important events in the lives of the emperors and with wars and their importance in the expansion and contraction of the empire, Eutropius reveals both a pro-senatorial bias—praising emperors who are on good terms with the senate—and a disdain for unnecessary conflict.
The popularity of the Breviarium is attested to by its translation into Greek a mere ten years after its composition; indeed, Paeanius's translation of 380 was followed by two other Greek translations: in the sixth century by Capito of Lycia, and in traces of the Chronographia of Theophanes the Confessor, an eighth-century Greek author. The Breviarium became a common textbook in the Middle Ages, both in its original form and in the expanded versions of Paul the Deacon (c. 800) and Landolfus Sagax (c. 1000). Later historians—including Peter Damiani (Historia Remensis), Henry of Huntingdon (Historia Anglorum), Vincent de Beauvais (Speculum Doctrinae), Saint Jerome, Ammianus Marcellinus, Saint Augustine, and Bede—would draw on Eutropius heavily in their own work. Editorial interest increased in the sixteenth century, when various editions of the Breviarium appeared; Daniel Nathan Erickson conjectures that the popularity of the Breviarium grew because it could be copied quickly due to its brevity, thus making it both attractive to manuscript copyists and less expensive for the public. Numerous editions appeared throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, when the Breviarium was used as a Latin textbook in Germany, Britain, and elsewhere. Although interest in the book has waned somewhat in the twentieth century, it continues to be used to supplement Roman republican and imperial history. The appearance of two new English translations in the last ten years also attests to a renewed interest in Eutropius and his work, which, as H. W. Bird has written, "for several hundred years after its composition … played a major role in transmitting knowledge of Rome to later generations."
Principal English Translations
A Briefe Chronicle, where in are described shortlye the originall, and the successiue estate of the Romaine weale publique, the alteratyon and chaunge of sondrye offices in the same … from the … foundatyon of the city of Rome, vnto the MC. and xix. yeare there of [translated by Nicolas Haward] 1564
Eutropius's Compendious History of Rome [translated by John Clarke] 1722
Eutropius's Epitome of the Roman History [translated by N. Thomas] 1760
Eutropius' Abridgement of Roman History [translated by John Selby Watson] 1853
The Breviarium ab Urbe Condita of Eutropius [translated by H. W. Bird] 1993
(The entire section is 90 words.)
SOURCE: "Eutropius" in Some Minor Roman Historians, E. J. Brill, 1972, pp. 114-72.
[In the following excerpt, Den Boer examines the possible source materials for Eutropius's works, what his histories reveal about ancient topography and chronology, and his attitudes toward Roman politics, especially domination of the barbarians, deification of emperors, and Constantine's conversion.]
Eutropius the Man
There are many gaps in our knowledge of Eutropius which will be impossible to fill. Modern scholars tend to identify him with a number of high-ranking officials of the same name who worked between the years 360 and 390. Caution must still, however, be observed. According to his praefatio, a dedication to emperor Valens, he was a magister memoriae. The dedication gives the emperor the titles Gothicus Maximus, so that 369 or 370 would seem to be the most likely date.
The validity of the identification of the historian with the proconsul of Asia in 371, who bore the same name, is most important.1 If this official is the same man as the historian,2 a terminus ante quem is set for the breviarium. After all, had he already been installed in this post, the author would not have failed to mention the fact in his dedication to the emperor. But some doubt remains as to whether the Eutropius known to have been Asiam...
(The entire section is 21497 words.)
SOURCE: "Eutropius on Numa Pompilius and the Senate," The Classical Journal, Vol. 81, No. 3, February-March, 1986, pp. 243-48.
[In this essay, Bird contends that the Breviarium's treatment of Roman rulers reveals that "what was primarily important for Eutropius was how they interacted with the senate."]
Eutropius was the Emperor Valens' magister memoriae in A.D. 369/370 and had accompanied the Emperor Julian on the ill-fated expedition against the Persians in 363. His Breviarium of Roman history from Rome's foundation to the death of Jovian in 364, written in clear, unaffected Latin, quickly become popular. It was soon translated into Greek and in its original Latin form became a school textbook for the middle ages and beyond. One of my own copies was published in Glasgow in 1783 and presented as a school prize to Moses Brown, a student in the fourth grade of Glasgow Grammar School in 1796.
In his preface Eutropius informs the reader of his general plan of composition: to arrange briefly from the foundation of Rome to his own day those particulars in war or peace most worthy of note with the concise additions of such matters in the lives of the emperors that were remarkable. The present article focuses upon Eutropius' repeated use of Numa Pompilius as an exemplum and his attitude towards the senate and certain republican personages who affected its status....
(The entire section is 2886 words.)
SOURCE: "Eutropius: In Defence of the Senate," Cahiers des Études anciennes, No. 20, 1987, pp. 63-72.
[In the following essay, Bird explores Eutropius's treatment of Roman governments as a response to the then-strained relations between the Emperor Valentinian and the senate.]
When Eutropius was composing his Breviarium of Roman history in ca. A.D. 369 he held senatorial rank'. It seems likely that he had attained this status ten years or so earlier when Constantius II promoted him to the post of magister epistularum2. His rank is important because it would significantly affect his point of view and one of the main political issues of the day was the influence of the senate3 Although this had long been a major concern, the accession of Valentinian and Valens in 364, both military men from Pannonia, exacerbated the situation. Apparently Valentinian "hated the well-dressed, the learned, the rich and the high-born4". Pannonians and others of humble origin were promoted to positions of power5 as Valentinian reorganized Italy and Rome. Senators, on the other hand, were excluded from many of their customary offices, especially the vicariate and prefecture of Rome, while most of the consulships went to generals and senior administrative posts were generally assigned to tried and trusted professionals. Consequently relations between Valentinian...
(The entire section is 3538 words.)
SOURCE: "Eutropius: His Life and Career," Echos du Monde Classique/Classical Views, Vol. 32, n.s., No. 7, 1988, pp. 51-60.
[In the essay that follows, Bird attempts to reconstruct the details of Eutropius's life, particularly his career as a Roman administrator.]
In spite of the confident assertions of many modern scholars,1 what we know for certain about the life and career of Eutropius, the author of the once popular Breviarium ab urbe condita, is extremely limited. What follows, therefore, is a considered, but tentative, reconstruction.
Eutropius, like his contemporary and fellow-abbreviator, Sextus Aurelius Victor, was born soon after A.D. 320,2 for he is called a contemporary of the Emperors Valens (b. 328?) and Julian (b. 331)3 and must have been at least in his mid- to late thirties when he was magister epistularum of Constantius prior to 361,4 and somewhat older in 369 when he served in the senior position of magister memoriae under Valens.5 It is possible that he was born in Italy,6 but his name and the fact that he owned estates in Asia7 and certainly spent most of his career in the East may indicate that his family had connections in Asia. At any rate, it is highly unlikely that he was a medical man from Bordeaux, as some modern scholars believe.8
(The entire section is 3879 words.)
SOURCE: "Structure and Themes in Eutropius's Breviarium," The Classical Bulletin, Vol. 66, Nos. 3-4, 1990, pp. 87-92.
[In the following essay, Bird contends that Livy 's Epitome provided Eutropius with a model by which to organize the book-divisions and themes of the Breviarium.]
When Eutropius came to write his abridged history of Rome in A.D. 369 he must have had a plan of composition, some idea of how long he wished to make his work, which sources he would utilize. He may even have discussed some of the particulars with his emperor, Valens, as the first words of the proemium seem to indicate, and the emperor's suggestions would not have been lightly disregarded. What Valens apparently wanted was a concise, straightforward but comprehensive history of Rome from its foundation down to the death of Jovian some five years earlier, when Valentinian and Valens had come to power. One major reason is manifest. According to Ammianus, Valens was somewhat lazy, subagrestis ingenii … nec liberalibus studiis eruditus.1 He is also described as a cessator et piger, inconsummatus et rudis.2 This was the emperor for whom Eutropius was writing, consequently the history in order to be palatable, would have to be clear, concise and simple in both design and language. Eutropius complied. There would be no need of documentation or a multiplicity of sources and it appears...
(The entire section is 3475 words.)
Bird, H. W. "Select Bibliography." In The Breviarium ab urbe condita of Eutropius, by Eutropius, translated by H. W. Bird, pp. 168-74. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1993.
Select bibliography of secondary sources on Eutropius and the late Roman Empire.
Müller, Friedhelm L. "Literaturverzeichnis." In Eutropii Breviarium ab urbe condita, by Eutropius, translated by Friedhelm L. Müller, pp. 311-18. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1995.
Bibliography of bibliographies, editions of Eutropius's work, and secondary sources in German, Italian, French, and English.
Claudianus, Claudius. The In Eutropium of Claudius Claudianus, translated by Alfred Carleton Andrews. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 1931, 135p.
Claudius Claudianus's invective against Eutropius, presented in Latin with Andrews's English translation on facing pages.
Erickson, Daniel Nathan. Introduction to Eutropius's "Compendium of Roman History": Introduction, Translation, and Notes, pp. 1-18. Ph. D. dissertation, Syracuse University, 1990.
Evaluates the literary and historical merit of Eutropius's history in comparison with three other fourth-century Roman compendia.
(The entire section is 152 words.)