Dutchman Essay - Critical Evaluation

Amiri Baraka

Critical Evaluation

Dutchman, an early play by the poet, dramatist, and political writer Amiri Baraka, was written when his name was still LeRoi Jones and at a transitional time for both the playwright and the Black Arts (or Black Aesthetics) movement. Dutchman reflects that transition in its aesthetic structure, its political content, and its implied audience.

This transition in African American drama can be characterized as a shift from aesthetics as they were traditionally defined by a primarily white, European-oriented theater community to an explicitly politicized and black nationalist art directed toward and arising from the African American community. Baraka’s work throughout the 1960’s marks a critical existential shift in stark terms: After winning an Obie Award for Dutchman in 1964 (Best Off-Broadway Play), he then in 1968 changed his name to emphasize his African and Kawaida identity and became Imamu Amiri Baraka. At the same time, his shift from artist-activist to black nationalist and Marxist-Leninist socialist critic marked his abandonment of the New York arts scene (including the avant-garde) to focus instead on literary forms deeply tied to African American revolutionary politics. Readers of Dutchman who pursue its critical reception will find revealing contrasts in interpretation depending on the political and aesthetic stance of the critic, especially in relation to historical changes and debates within African American liberation politics.

The play itself opens on a subway, “in the flying underbelly of the city,” a subterranean metaphor for both the rattling dissonance of American culture and the psychological interior terrain of American racial politics. Baraka sets up the association: “Steaming hot, and summer on top, outside. Underground. The subway heaped in modern myth.”

The play consists of two short scenes between the two characters as they ride the subway together. A metaphoric and ironic Eden is suggested when Lula eats an apple and then offers one to Clay. Their first exchange, in which Lula ridicules the image Clay seems to be trying to project, establishes the pivotal issue of power (that is, who controls the conversation) and unveils both Clay’s aspirations to the middle class and Lula’s moral instability. As the scene proceeds, the tension between them builds. Lula pushes hard, making sexual overtures that are seductive one moment and arrogant and derogatory the next. Clay stays almost entirely reactive to Lula’s definition of...

(The entire section is 1033 words.)