Deloria, Vine, Jr. (Vol. 21)
Vine Deloria, Jr. 1933–
American Indian young adult and adult nonfiction writer and editor.
Deloria is representative of a new breed of American Indian: well-educated and concerned for the plight of the Indian forced to live in a white man's system. In his writings, Deloria argues for the return of sacred grounds and an isolationist policy that would enable his people to function as a separate nation within the United States. A Standing Rock Sioux born and raised on a reservation, Deloria is particularly qualified to enlighten the public on the Indian's present status in our society. Following in the footsteps of his father and grandfather, Deloria trained for a career as a minister. After receiving his degree in divinity from the Lutheran School of Theology, however, he realized a more effective means of serving the Indian's cause was through the legal system, and consequently earned a law degree from the University of Colorado. As executive director of the National Congress of American Indians in Washington, D.C., Deloria turned that nearly defuct organization into a forceful voice for the Indian tribes.
Deloria has stated that his exposure to Western culture has served to reaffirm his childhood commitment to the traditional Indian way of life. The main premise of his writings is the need for an Indian cultural nationalism, as opposed to the intellectual assimilation of minorities advocated by the white establishment. Deloria approaches the issues from a religious and legal standpoint. He believes that Christianity is no longer practical, with its promise of heaven so remote from everyday life in an industrial society, and that the naturalism of Indian religion is the only hope for Western civilization. Deloria also believes the government should honor the various treaties made with the Indians concerning their lands. Despite the seriousness of his subjects, Deloria's writing is informal and often wryly humorous, making it accessible to any reader interested in the modern Indian. Although many people do not agree with his ideas, Deloria is nevertheless respected for the sincerity and integrity of his works. (See also Contemporary Authors, Vols. 53-56.)
Nancy Oestreich Lurie
[The differences in goals and methods of black militancy and red nationalism is a subject fraught with confusion and misunderstanding for the general public, both black and white.] Deloria's very equivocation as to any mutual relevance of the red and the black movements [in Custer Died for Your Sins] is characteristic of the thinking of many young Indians and thus informative. Another chapter—that on Indian humor—would have elucidated the Indian mood very well for the average, uninformed American and helped to explain what "Custer Died for Your Sins" implies. These chapters and those dealing with the central issue of treaties in Indian political ideology, the history of cross-purposes in Indian administration, the nature of Indian leadership, the interplay of cultural and social forces between country- and urban-based Indians, the range from assimilationists to traditionalists among Indians, and even Deloria's personal preferences as to policy and program reform justify the subtitle of his book as An Indian Manifesto rather than just An Indian's Manifesto….
The book is certainly crotchety, and the three chapters dealing with anthropologists, missionaries, and the government are fully comprehensible only to an often infighting ingroup rather than to the general public for whom the book is intended. Nevertheless, whatever personal bias Deloria brings to his writing out of his more white than Siouan ancestry, a...
(The entire section is 517 words.)
James A. Phillips
If ["Custer Died for your Sins: an Indian Manifesto"] is indicative of Deloria's methods, he's more interested in results than in being tactful.
Nauseated by the traditional Indian image, he asserts the worth if not the dignity of the redman and blasts the political, social, and religious forces that perpetuate the Little Big Horn and wigwam stereotyping of his people. Admittedly and intentionally he offends the people from whom help might come—Congress, anthropologists, and churches. When he's not specifically attacking these groups, he's vituperative about the general society that allows other groups to have predicaments, problems, or troubles, but insists that Indians have a "plight."… The threat of Indian insurrection is more latent than tacit, and understandably so if we can believe his lengthy discussion of how Indians have been neglected, cheated, and starved in a society so concerned with improving the lot of minority groups such as the Blacks….
Although Deloria's subject is serious, he approaches it nonformally. In fact, he devotes a chapter to Indian humor in addition to generously sprinkling anecdotes and one-liners into his commentary….
The plea of this book is retribalization of the people and recolonization of unsettled areas of the nation while Indians fear-fully note the ever-present dangers of reservation entanglements and the black power movement. Indians must learn to...
(The entire section is 276 words.)
If you are interested in savoring the emotional tone (as well as listening to some of the crucial ideas) of the emerging Indian protest movement, you will find [Custer Died for Your Sins] useful and important. Indian resentment toward white men and white society is set forth with memorable vividness….
But this book is no mere negative diatribe. In it we find set forth the essence of a program for rehabilitating Indian society, perhaps even for saving white society in the bargain….
The book is full of exaggeration—much of it quite deliberate. It contains many paradoxes, if not contradictions. Yet its message emerges with startling clarity. It is a message worth hearing.
Tyler Thompson, "Red, Brown Protest," in The Christian Century (copyright 1970 Christian Century Foundation; reprinted by permission from the February 18, 1970 issue of The Christian Century), Vol. 87, No. 7, February 18, 1970, p. 213.∗
(The entire section is 141 words.)
Deloria brings into focus the moods and habitat of the contemporary Indian as seen by a Standing Rock Sioux, not by a research anthropologist or a jobber in the basketry trades. He peels away layers of tinsel and feathers heaped upon the Indian by misinformed whites (beginning with Columbus), and he reveals an uncanny ability for impaling them on the fine points of their own illogic.
Cecil Eby, "Tonto Was an Uncle Tomahawk," in Book World—The Washington Post (© 1970 Postrib Corp.; reprinted by permission of Chicago Tribune and The Washington Post), October 4, 1970, p. 4.
(The entire section is 93 words.)
John S. Phillipson
[Mr. Deloria] is an Indian with an ironic sense of humor and an urgent message for the world today: to survive, it needs the flexibility of the tribe and the tribal viewpoint. (pp. 281-82)
In ["We Talk, You Listen" we have] a discussion interwoven of ecology, economics, politics, sociology, anthropology, history, and religion, all relating to man's sad plight today in which he faces fairly imminent extinction unless he drastically changes his way of life. Instead of the "liberal nonsense" he decries, Mr. Deloria gives us advice we should do well to heed. It makes sense. I found only Chapter 3 dull going, with a noticeable amount of social-scientific jargon, some faulty syntax ("a media") and tautology ("progressive motion forward")…. But elsewhere the book is a pleasure to read—assuming that one doesn't become too depressed by the revelation of the white man's folly—and it should be read. The Indians are talking, and we had better listen. (p. 282)
John S. Phillipson, "'We Talk, You Listen'," in Best Sellers (copyright 1970, by the University of Scranton), Vol. 30, No. 14, October 15, 1970, pp. 281-82.
(The entire section is 179 words.)
The New Yorker
[We Talk, You Listen: New Tribes, New Turf is an] argumentative rather than informative book…. [The author] adopts a controversial style reminiscent of his forefathers' fighting style: avoid pitched battles, loose a shower of arrows, and dart off. The Parthians fought the Romans this way, the Turks the Crusaders; though it is not magnificent, it is war. Mr. Deloria's paleface readers are not persuaded or enlightened; they are simply attacked. Here and there, Mr. Deloria seems to be starting a conversation, but it always turns into a war whoop.
"Briefly Noted: 'We Talk, You Listen: New Tribes, New Turf'," in The New Yorker (© 1970 by The New Yorker Magazine, Inc.), Vol. 46, No. 36, October 24, 1970, p. 76.
(The entire section is 113 words.)
W. Roger Buffalohead
A number of American Indians have wanted to write a book like [Custer Died For Your Sins], or have threatened to. But while others dreamed, procrastinated, or found other outlets for their energies, Vine Deloria, Jr. … persevered and has produced a witty, provocative, and sometimes crotchety interpretation of the past and current state of affairs of American Indians.
Written for the general public, this is nevertheless an Indian book and, as such, contains much of significance for Indians and non-Indians alike. Many on both sides will find viewpoints designed to raise the blood pressure and force a reappraisal of Indian-white relations. (p. 553)
Unlike many younger Indians, Deloria opposes militant confrontation with white society. Rather, he argues, struggles in the "intellectual arena" will bring about the desired aims: self-determination in all phases of Indian life and a humane and personalized alternative to contemporary industrialized urban society. According to Deloria, Indians may realize their potential only by strengthening "tribalism" and integrating the desired fruits of Western culture into their way of life. At the same time, they must, by the difficult process of accretion, establish the legal, moral, and intellectual foundations which will enable Indians to save themselves and, perhaps, save America.
While this approach is commendable and has some validity, there is—to...
(The entire section is 621 words.)
N. Scott Momaday
The title of Vine Deloria's new book, We Talk, You Listen, is significant in that it appears to express in itself a new and prevalent attitude among Indians, and young Indians in particular, a quality of anger and self-assertion that has been dormant for a long time, for generations indeed. The New Indian, as he has been called, talks of living standards and job opportunities, education and health programs—both on and off the reservations—and he talks as never before of political action and organization. (p. 39)
In two books to date, Custer Died for Your Sins and We Talk, You Listen, Vine Deloria, Jr., has written about the Indian world, traditional and contemporary, in terms that are congenial as well as authoritative. Deloria is … a man very much in tune with contemporary Indian affairs. But in presuming to speak for the Indian in all his diversity, he has been led more than once to generalize and sometimes to err….
In Custer Died for Your Sins, Deloria is concerned primarily to advance a theory of "tribalism," but, regrettably, he fails to tell us precisely what he means by that term….
In the more recent We Talk, You Listen, the notion of tribalism is amplified, extended by legal analysis. Deloria believes that the concept of individualism, as a tenet of the democratic faith, is outmoded. (p. 40)
Central to Deloria's thesis, again if I...
(The entire section is 649 words.)
[Custer Died for Your Sins: An Indian Manifesto] is the most ambitious and most successful overview of contemporary American Indian affairs and aspirations I have ever read, whether "contemporary" is defined as the 1950's, 1960's, or the beginning of the 1970's…. Neither the range of scholars who view the Indian from the confines of their own academic perspectives nor the areal specialists are likely to be satisfied with Deloria's coverage, but this is a danger inherent in any and every attempt at a general treatment of the Indian's current status in American life. The two chapters covering laws, treaties, and termination, for instance, are too programmatic, but the subjects have been well chronicled by others. Another chapter, entitled "Indian Humor," is unrepresentative in that it is elitist; if most Indians could pierce through very complex if incongruous situations of the modern world and perceive the humor in them, as Deloria so obviously can, then we would not have quite the problems we do. Still another, entitled "The Red and the Black," has had more than one commentator from among the latter up the wall for a variety of reasons. But, all in all, this is the most comprehensive treatment of the subject available in a readable format; every special interest group impinging on Indian communities today comes in for an unkind word at some time or other. (p. 953)
Alfonso Ortiz, "Other: 'Custer Died for...
(The entire section is 260 words.)
[With "God Is Red" Deloria] has written yet another gripping account on the fate of the American Indian. Vine Deloria's interests range far and wide; the lore of his people is examined from an incredible number of different perspectives; various books of the Bible are introduced as history, and incredibly complex scientific (and other) data or explanations … are cited to give new twists to old beliefs. It is indeed a fascinating tale.
The discussion takes place on two levels. The first, and the one I can recommend to all readers, consists of a recital of selected injustices perpetrated upon the Red Man by the European settlers on this continent. The second, which is really the thesis of the book, I am far less sure about. Deloria seems to have concluded that in order to prove the Indians' way of life superior to that of the settlers', it was necessary to show that such superiority was no accident, but arose from the very basis of the two respective life styles.
The author finds the cause in the separate religious styles of the two peoples. Indian religion binds men to the soil, to their ancestry. The believer, his society, and the universe become one, and the religious experience is directly relevant to him. The message is cooperative, the life-style protective, and each member finds meaning and life itself in the very existence of his tribe….
So far, so good. In this era of impending ecological...
(The entire section is 472 words.)
Robert C. Nelson
Christ Jesus' guidelines have been judged impractical because difficult to obey. The falterings of his followers have been taken as proof enough that the Sermon on the Mount is too lofty to apply to real people.
But Christianity persists, in spite of its abusers. It survives all the perilous times. The Kingdom of God is not conquered, damaged, or displaced. It is always safely within—as Jesus said it would be—within consciousness centering more on God, less on self.
Thus Vine Deloria's indictments [in "God is Red"] are not new; his alternatives are. He finds American Christians bumbling and hypocritical; cruel, inane, and rootless. Rootless. That's his key. American Christians have no spiritual unity with the land on which their religion is practiced. American Indians do. Their religions will lead the way out of empty Christian worship, he maintains….
How this reformation of the Christian in America is to be accomplished is not spelled out. Perhaps that is because Mr. Deloria is not yet sure how—or whether—to blot out what he has learned of Christianity, so that what he feels as an Indian can dominate his being.
Thus this skilled writer, practicing lawyer, forceful spokesman for American Indian rights, speaks on two levels—one philosophical, one personal.
The insights into his country's Indian religious heritage are important reading. The barbs against...
(The entire section is 306 words.)
George H. Frein
[With God Is Red Deloria has written] a highly telling polemic against Christianity.
The core of God Is Red is a comparison of Christian and Indian beliefs about the nature of religion, creation, the meaning of history, the character of religious experience, death, human personality and community, and the role of religion in the contemporary world. The basic difference between the two religions is that one perceives the world in terms of time, the other in terms of space. (p. 186)
Many readers will find fault with the Christian writers Deloria relies upon to describe the Christian faith, but they serve well enough. Other writers more in keeping with one's own Christian bias would no doubt serve Deloria's criticism just as well. Most readers will wish that less space had been given to the defects of Christianity and more to the religion of the land and its native peoples. But, after reading God Is Red it will be impossible to be content with Indian history and romance. Deloria makes an irresistible case for reading The Sacred Pipe. Black Elk Speaks, Lame Deer: Seeker of Visions, and other sources of tribal religious wisdom as an aid to saving one's land and soul. (p. 187)
George H. Frein, "What Christians Do with History." in The Nation (copyright 1974 The Nation magazine, The Nation Associates, Inc.), Vol. 218. No. 6, February 9, 1974....
(The entire section is 225 words.)
Francis A. Lalley
His native viewpoint is the unique strength of Deloria's writing. He can explain how the world appears to those who were here on this continent countless centuries before Europeans arrived. The world does not appear as an arena for struggle between humanity and nature, as the Christian creation story suggests. Death is not something evil that must be conquered, as the Christian resurrection may imply. Religion for the native people has never been "other worldly" but intimately tied to the natural phenomena of this world. In these areas and others, Deloria discusses the differences of perception and feeling among Christian and native people with regard to this continent and its religious meaning.
[God Is Red] is not all serious theology. He writes with amusement about some extraordinary manifestations of contemporary Christianity…. There is both hope and despair in Deloria's book. He is hopeful about the survival of Indian religious experience when discussing the restoration of Blue Lake to the Taos Pueblo in New Mexico. He is more often despairing of any religious experience surviving in America, either Indian or Christian….
Deloria is antagonistic toward much of Christian belief. In fairness, however, it must be noted that he has gone to our schools and learned our theology and is now urging us to do likewise—listen to his people and perhaps learn from them. Although his book will not be pleasant reading...
(The entire section is 272 words.)
Leo E. Oliva
[In Behind the Trail of Broken Treaties] Deloria argues effectively that the best solution to the "Indian problem," for Indians and the federal government alike, is to honor old treaties and to develop a new treaty relationship which gives tribes the status of quasi-international independence (with the U.S. acting as protector). The legal and moral arguments are set into historical developments; and the major objections to restoration of tribal sovereignty are countered with reason and with examples from around the world…. This well-written plea deserves the consideration of every American: Deloria is clearly a spokesman to be heard.
Leo E. Oliva, "The Contemporary Scene: 'Behind the Trail of Broken Treaties: An Indian Declaration of Independence'," in Library Journal (reprinted from Library Journal, August, 1974; published by R. R. Bowker Co. (a Xerox company); copyright © 1974 by Xerox Corporation), Vol. 99. No. 14, August, 1974, p. 1923.
(The entire section is 141 words.)
Among his people Vine Deloria Jr. has achieved a status somewhat similar to that of Sitting Bull's leadership of the Sioux tribes a century ago. Deloria is not a warrior ("The time for playing cowboys and Indians is over," he said recently) but is more the strategist—the thinker and the planner…. What Deloria wants is affirmative action by the U.S. Congress to define Indian tribes as smaller nations to be left alone to run their own affairs….
"Behind the Trail of Broken Treaties" is not only the best account yet written of events leading to Wounded Knee 1973, it is also a compelling argument for a reopening of the treaty-making procedure between Indian tribes and the U.S. Government; an action which the author is convinced would place this country in the forefront of civilized nations for its treatment of native peoples.
In presenting a historical background for events of the past decade, Deloria chides chroniclers of the Indian wars who believe that the first Wounded Knee (1890) marked the end of the Indian struggle to preserve national identity. The fighting has continued all these years, Deloria maintains, but without feathered war bonnets and slashing cavalry swords….
Deloria also admonishes the New Left of the 1960's for regarding Indians as another domestic minority group. He says the Indians do not see themselves as such; they believe that their struggle is of historical significance,...
(The entire section is 412 words.)
More than any other author, Indian or white, dealing with the topic of current Indian affairs, Vine Deloria has challenged and stimulated the general public and the academic community. The impact of his Custer died for your sins …, We talk, you listen …, and God is red … attests to that. [Behind the trail of broken treaties] is equally provocative. Deloria calls for government adoption of the "Twenty Points" of the caravan of Indians known as the Trail of Broken Treaties that occupied the Bureau of Indian Affairs in 1972. A major goal is to restore authority to make treaties with Indians and to restore Indian tribes to a status of quasi-international independence with the U.S. acting as their protector. Deloria evaluates arguments against this proposal and finds them wanting. He also provides a historical summary of federal treatment of Indians and explains the development of the current Indian protest movement. He is eloquent but occasionally eloquently unrealistic because of white attitudes.
"Social and Behavioral Sciences: 'Behind the Trail of Broken Treaties: An Indian Declaration of Independence'," in Choice (copyright © 1974 by American Library Association), Vol. 11, No. 10, December, 1974, p. 1508.
(The entire section is 186 words.)
Jean K. Boek
[We Talk, You Listen: New Tribes, New Turf] is another product of an era in which advocates are being heard for black power, women's lib, senior power, unionization of teachers, gay liberation, consumer's rights, and unification of higher education. It is also observable that some of these advocates wish their audience simply to accept their version of the situation without being given the opportunity of examining it further. In common with these, Vine Deloria, Jr. gives the reader a view of Indian problems without providing independent means of assessing this information. Hence, as he hops from one topic to the next under the rubrics of the communications gap, stereotyping, black power, and the artificial universe, among others, he provides few clues as to the basics of who, when, where and what. Because of this, it is difficult to learn much from the examples cited, or, indeed, to be very certain of the accuracy of their reporting.
These difficulties are further compounded by his occasional use of sarcasm…. Moreover, his polarization and simplification of events becomes perhaps more entertaining than enlightening….
Even when he discusses various programs aimed to ameliorate problems, one is not told his sources of information in order to follow up on these….
If a person is not bothered by the feeling that he is being toyed with and largely left in the dark, he might be able to read to...
(The entire section is 356 words.)
[The Indian Affair is a] short, critical essay by a noted Indian author on the despoiling and exploiting of the American Indian by individuals, federal agencies, and corporations, all aided by Christian missionaries. Yet, churches are cited for educating the Indians when no one else would, and some leading government figures are credited because of their pro-Indian efforts. Due to its brevity the work offers little in the way of detail. It should serve, however, as a good general introduction to the topic for all those who like to read about Indians. It offers little, however, to the scholar or the researcher.
"Social and Behavioral Sciences: 'The Indian Affair'," in Choice (copyright © 1975 by American Library Association), Vol. 12, No. 2, April, 1975, p. 256.
(The entire section is 120 words.)
Francis Paul Prucha
In his Behind the Trail of Broken Treaties: An Indian Declaration of Independence …, Deloria draws together the arguments for autonomous status for the Indians. It is not an objective account, for Deloria is clearly promoting a cause. The book, too, has a good many factual errors, and it is frequently inconsistent in what it proposes. The author, moreover, has a hard time deciding just what status he is advocating for the Indians. Is it to be "international status," "quasi-protectorate status," "contractual sovereignty" or "a new treaty relationship"? Nor can he assert that he speaks for all the Indians. Yet the message that comes through despite these faults is an extremely important one. No one can read this book and continue to think complacently that the Indians' cries for justice and compensation are only a passing irritant for white America, which will soon quiet down and go away. Whoever is concerned about Indian affairs today must read books like this to get a feeling of what the agitation is all about. (p. 457)
Francis Paul Prucha, "The Land Was Theirs," in America (© America Press, 1976; all rights reserved), Vol. 134, No. 20, May 22, 1976, pp. 456-57.∗
(The entire section is 190 words.)
[In Behind the Trail of Broken Treaties Deloria argues that] Indian tribes are, or should be under treaty law, semi-autonomous and self-determining communities….
The usual claim of "pragmatists" in Indian policy today is that it is too late to redress the grievances of the past. Indians are too few, too politically and economically impotent, too little endowed with the capacity for self-improvement. Deloria chooses to counter these arguments with a comparative study of the political, economic, and educational profiles of various independent and semi-independent states recognized internationally. (p. 1306)
The argument, of course, is that "contract sovereignty" is akin to "protectorate" status, which has "a long history of acceptance in international diplomatic practice, even though at times the states in question have had difficulty maintaining their independence."… Such recognition would "clarify the status of Indian tribes and eliminate the inconsistencies that are presently found in the federal relationship with Indians."… Deloria ends the book by outlining steps to accomplish this reworking of the federal principle, based on negotiation between the tribes and the federal government.
The idealism in this idea," Deloria acknowledges, "is obvious."… So perhaps are some of the flaws. Legal arguments about Indian sovereignty are controversial; the international parallels shaky. The...
(The entire section is 292 words.)
[Deloria fills a gap with Indians of the Pacific Northwest] by describing the impact of rapid white settlement on the Puget Sound and Washington Coast tribes, which are often neglected in history books in favor of the potlatch and totem pole tribes farther north. The chapters which relate—in exhaustive detail—the long uphill battle waged to retain treaty-guaranteed fishing rights and maintain tribal identity may cause reader interest to lag. However, Deloria has a keen understanding of Indian rights and often enlivens his narrative with fascinating information such as the account of how the Lummis built an ultramodern aquaculture project capable of producing 100 million oysters a year in the traditional style of the cedar long-house.
Marily Richards, "'Indians of the Pacific Northwest'," in School Library Journal (reprinted from the April, 1977 issue of School Library Journal, published by R. R. Bowker Co./ A Xerox Corporation; copyright © 1977), Vol. 23, No. 8, April, 1977, p. 76.
(The entire section is 150 words.)
Linda Morgan Rubens
In what is essentially a legal and political history [Indians of the Pacific Northwest: From the Coming of the White Man to the Present Day], Deloria introduces the tribes of the Puget Sound region with an eye toward their historic and current victimization and their efforts at fighting back. He makes known the complex, fish-based economy that operated before the coming of the white man…. Deloria calls close attention to a series of treaties forged in the mid-19th century when Washington became a U.S. territory. These treaties have been pivotal in present-day battles over Indian fishing rights. The state of Washington and the U.S. Department of the Interior come in for heavy criticism; the author, who himself has worked on behalf of the tribes, pulls out statistics and arguments that soundly dispute sportsmen's and states' contentions that the Indians are ruining the region's fishing…. A feisty, forthright account; sympathetic, thorough, and never dull.
Linda Morgan Rubens, "Children's Books: 'Indians of the Pacific Northwest: From the Coming of the White Man to the Present Day'," in Booklist (reprinted by permission of the American Library Association; copyright © 1977 by the American Library Association), Vol. 74, No. 1. September 1, 1977, p. 38.
(The entire section is 197 words.)