Contemporary Feminist Criticism
The following entry presents analysis and criticism of contemporary feminist literary theory through 2002.
Sometimes referred to as “Third-Wave Feminism,” “Postfeminism,” or “Revisionary Feminism,” contemporary feminist criticism is the historical outgrowth of the feminist movement which began in the 1960s and continues to flourish into the twenty-first century. Like their predecessors, contemporary feminists explore the relationship between gender and language and issues of both overt and tacit discrimination against women within the publishing and academic worlds. The writers voicing the concerns of the new generation of feminist critics, however, have increasingly emphasized what they perceive as limitations in the scope of traditional feminist rhetoric and point to a gap in the dialogue between the older and younger schools of feminist theory.
Revisionary feminist critics posit that feminist criticism has traditionally been the bastion of Western, white, intellectual, heterosexual, middle- and upper-class women. These revisionists seek to effect change within the movement by promoting an agenda of multiculturalism, globalism, sensitivity to political and economic issues involving women, and the inclusion of texts by and about non-white and lesbian women. Also, unlike their forebears, contemporary feminist critics profess to be less interested in affirming their equality with men than exploring the differences that make women's position in society unique. They also maintain that feminist criticism has become too theoretical and abstruse due to the influence of structuralism, which has problematized the very notion of language as a means of simple communication. The school of French feminist criticism—largely defined by the works of Hélène Cixous, Luce Irigaray, and Julia Kristeva, and once one of the most celebrated branches of the feminist movement—has recently come under attack by postfeminist critics who argue that French feminism never existed as a separate entity at all. These critics assert that the notion of French feminist rhetoric was invented by American and British feminist academics in order to showcase radical ideas that they were not willing to present as their own. Additionally, revisionist feminist critics have accused their older colleagues of defensiveness, dismissiveness, and the suppression of dialogue in the same kind of hierarchical manner—complete with gender-based assumptions—that they so criticized in male literary critics in the 1960s and 1970s.
Gisela Bock and Susan James, editors
Beyond Equality and Difference: Citizenship, Feminist Politics, and Female Subjectivity (essays and criticism) 1992
Postfeminisms: Feminism, Cultural Theory, and Cultural Forms (criticism) 1997
Entre l'ectriture [Coming to Writing and Other Essays] (essays) 1986
Jours de l'an [First Days of the Year] (prose and criticism) 1990
Josephine Donovan, editor
Feminist Literary Criticism: Explorations in Theory (essays and criticism) 1975
Barbara Findlen, editor
Listen Up: Voices from the Next Feminist Generation (essays) 1995
Critical Condition: Feminism at the Turn of the Century (essays and criticism) 2000
Leslie Heywood and Jennifer Drake, editors
Third Wave Agenda: Being Feminist, Doing Feminism (essays and criticism) 1997
Christina Hoff Sommers
Who Stole Feminism? How Women Have Betrayed Women (criticism) 1994
Speculum de l'autre femme [Speculum of the Other Woman] (criticism) 1974
*Ce sexe qui n'en est pas un [This Sex Which Is Not One] (criticism) 1977
†Éthique de la différence sexuelle [An Ethics of Sexual Difference] (criticism) 1983
Sexes et parentés [Sexes and Genealogies] (criticism) 1987
Sèméiotikè (essays and criticism) 1969
Polylogue (essays and criticism) 1977
‡Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art [edited by Leon S. Roudiez] (essays and criticism) 1980
The Kristeva Reader [edited by Toril Moi] (essays and criticism) 1986
Devoney Looser and E. Ann Kaplan, editors
Generation: Academic Feminists in Dialogue (essays and criticism) 1997
Feminism without Women: Culture and Criticism in a “Postfeminist” Age (criticism) 1991
Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory (criticism) 1985
French Feminist Thought: A Reader [editor] (essays and criticism) 1987
Ella Shohat, editor
Talking Visions: Multicultural Feminism in a Transitional Age (essays and criticism) 1998
Rebecca Walker, editor
To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism (essays and criticism) 1995
Fire with Fire: The New Female Power and How It Will Change the 21st Century (criticism) 1993
*In addition to the title essay, this work comprises the essays “The Mirror, from the Other Side,” “Così fan tutti,” “Women on the Market,” “Commodities among Themselves,” “Questions,” “The Power of Discourse and the Subordination of the Feminine,” and “When Our Lips Speak Together.”
†This work contains the essays “The Fecundity of the Caress,” “Sexual Difference,” and “Sorcerer Love: A Reading of Plato's Symposium, Diotima's Speech.”
‡Includes selections from Polylogue and Sèméiotikè.
SOURCE: Wiegman, Robyn. “Critical Response I: What Ails Feminist Criticism? A Second Opinion.” Critical Inquiry 25, no. 2 (winter 1999): 362-79.
[In the following essay, Wiegman uses Susan Gubar's article “What Ails Feminist Criticism?” as a point of departure for discussing some of the challenges facing contemporary feminist rhetoric.]
In “Murder without a Text,” Amanda Cross (better known to academics as Carolyn Heilbrun) offers a tale of feminist generational fury and murder that might be of interest to readers of Susan Gubar's “What Ails [formerly “Who Killed”] Feminist Criticism?” (Critical Inquiry 24 [Summer 1998]: 878-902). Cross's...
(The entire section is 8604 words.)
SOURCE: Hogeland, Lisa Maria. “Against Generational Thinking, or, Some Things That ‘Third Wave’ Feminism Isn't.” Women's Studies in Communication 24, no. 1 (spring 2001): 107-21.
[In the following essay, Hogeland identifies three distinct phases of feminist writing from the 1960s to the present, noting that the different generations of feminists suffer more from an evasion of dialogue than overt disagreement.]
In the 1980s and 1990s, feminists began to worry about “the next generation” of feminism. In 1983, Ms. Magazine published a “Special Issue on Young Feminists,” and the first of the several books and anthologies asserting a “third wave”...
(The entire section is 6180 words.)
SOURCE: Grosz, Elizabeth. “Feminist Futures?” Tulsa Studies in Women's Literature 21, no. 1 (spring 2002): 13-20.
[In the following essay, Grosz explores two strands of futurist feminist criticism as expressed through the works of Luce Irigaray and Gilles Deleuze.]
A revolution in thought and ethics is needed if the work of sexual difference is to take place. We need to reinterpret everything concerning the relations between the subject and discourse, the subject and the world, the subject and the cosmic, the microcosmic and the macrocosmic. …
In order to make it possible to think through,...
(The entire section is 3198 words.)
SOURCE: Kavka, Misha. “Feminism, Ethics, and History; or, What Is the ‘Post’ in Postfeminism?” Tulsa Studies in Women's Literature 21, no. 1 (spring 2002): 29-44.
[In the following essay, Kavka discusses the term “post-feminism,” linking the study of feminism with ethical history studies in such works as Toril Moi's Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory and Christina Hoff Sommers's Who Stole Feminism? How Women Have Betrayed Women.]
Let us assume for the moment that there is such a thing as feminist history, that is, a history of feminism. This may seem, admittedly, like going backward. In her landmark article “Women's Time,” Julia...
(The entire section is 7426 words.)
SOURCE: Flynn, Elizabeth A. “Toward Postmodern-Feminist Rhetoric and Composition.” In Feminism beyond Modernism, pp. 116-34. Carbondale and Edwardsville, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press, 2002.
[In the following essay, Flynn focuses on various obstacles to the growth of a postmodern feminist viewpoint within the areas of composition and rhetoric.]
[W]e should investigate ways of giving an identity to the sciences, to religions, and to political policies and of situating ourselves in relation to them as subjects in our own right.
—Luce Irigaray, Je, Tu, Nous: Toward a Culture of Difference...
(The entire section is 9515 words.)
SOURCE: Messer-Davidow, Ellen. “Disciplining Women.” In Disciplining Feminism: From Social Activism to Academic Discourse, pp. 19-48. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2002.
[In the following essay, Messer-Davidow examines the experiences of women within particular academic fields—utilizing essays from Evelyn Fox Keller, Elaine Showalter, Lillian S. Robinson, and Lise Vogel—and asserts that disciplinary discourse itself negates the feminist point of view.]
Disciplines are institutionalized formations for organizing schemes of perception, appreciation, and action, and for inculcating them as tools of cognition and communication....
(The entire section is 14170 words.)