The introduction to Communities of Women examines essential differences between communities of men and communities of women. Auerbach uses examples of women in classical literature to show the traditional vulnerability of sisterhood to the male hero and to reveal the mutilation, both social and physical, which is associated with isolated groups of women. Yet, these marginalized groups also possess power. The Muses’ control of immortality, for example, attests women’s exclusion from, yet centrality to, civilization.
Auerbach argues, then, that the power of communities of women is not obvious because the classical image of mutilation associated with women who exist without men persists throughout history. Male and female communities differ in terms of authority, which is granted to male communities outwardly by the realities of the world or inwardly by the nature of man’s own power. Female communities, on the other hand, must create their own authority; their goal is partially to gain a sense of self. Both male and female communities are united by a code, but the male code is overtly articulated and inspirational, while the code within the groups of women is private and subversive.
Auerbach argues that the controversy aroused by the idea of strong communities of women is proof of the importance of that idea and traces contemporary ideas about women’s groups to nineteenth century perceptions of sisterhood in England and America....
(The entire section is 1065 words.)
Want to Read More?
Subscribe now to read the rest of Communities of Women Critical Essays. Plus get complete access to 30,000+ study guides!