Clear and Present Danger
There is no doubt that Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes rendered his most important service to the American democratic process when he insisted in 1919 that only a “clear and present danger” could justify Congressional interference with freedom of speech. Holmes’s phrase entered into American jurisprudence as the legal standard with which to assess the constitutional validity of any action by the government of the United States or its agents. Indeed, government actions which, in the minds of a majority of Americans have been prompted by such a threat have invariably met with approval. At the same time, the American, people have consistently required prior notification regarding governmental actions undertaken to defend the nation, as well as questioning undesirable means employed in pursuit of an otherwise acceptable end.
Tom Clancy’s latest novel is an admirable attempt to demonstrate what might be the result if an American administration, in response to an apparent public perception that the illegal importation of illicit drugs constitutes a clear and present danger, resolved to employ the armed forces of the country to limit the operations of the Colombian drug barons. Unfortunately, in Clancy’s scenario this operation is launched without the knowledge of the nation’s elected representatives in Congress, and the methods employed are questionable.
CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER is a gripping tale of suspense which holds the reader in its...
(The entire section is 327 words.)
Show us the love and view this for free! Use the facebook like button, or any other share button on this page, and get this content free!free!
Want to Read More?
Subscribe now to read the rest of Clear and Present Danger Critical Essays. Plus get complete access to 30,000+ study guides!