When dealing with the story of a person who lived in as remote a time as Archimedes, the author has several drawbacks with which to contend. These include a paucity of original documents, the questionable reliability of subsequent authors’ accounts, and the complete absence of information concerning relevant items of interest. These are problems that have beset the many authors who have been fascinated by Archimedes and have tried to share their knowledge of him with readers as completely and accurately as possible.
For an author such as Bendick, who attempts this task on a level that will attract young readers, there are further problems to be met. Bendick cannot assume that her readers have any familiarity with the world in which Archimedes lived or with the importance of his place either in long-term history or in his contemporary society. Bendick has achieved considerable success in her task through a variety of means. For example, she begins her story of Archimedes by integrating the facts of Archimedes’ birth in 287 b.c. as the son of an established astronomer into what is known from other historical sources about the customs and ceremonies that attended the birth of a child of that social class in an important Greek city such as Syracuse. Bendick then presents a picture of the early education and training of a young boy toward becoming a worthy citizen of Greece. Her writing style is geared to the modern young...
(The entire section is 808 words.)
Want to Read More?
Subscribe now to read the rest of Archimedes and the Door of Science Critical Essays. Plus get complete access to 30,000+ study guides!