Absalom, Absalom! Essay - Critical Evaluation

William Faulkner

Critical Evaluation

Absalom, Absalom! is the most involved of William Faulkner’s works, for the narrative is revealed by recollections years after the events described have taken place. Experience is related at its fullest expression; its initial import is recollected, and its significance years thereafter is faithfully recorded. The conventional method of storytelling is discarded. Through his special method, Faulkner re-creates human action and human emotion in their own setting. Sensory impressions gained at the moment, family traditions as powerful stimuli, the tragic impulses—these focus in the reader’s mind so that a tremendous picture of the nineteenth century South, vivid down to the most minute detail, grows slowly in the reader’s imagination.

This novel is Faulkner’s most comprehensive attempt to come to terms with the full implications of the southern experience. The structure of the novel, itself an attempt by its various narrators to make some sense of the seemingly chaotic past, is indicative of the multifaceted complexity of that experience, and the various narrators’ relationship to the material suggests the difficulty that making order of the past entails. Each narrator has, to begin with, only part of the total picture—and some parts of that hearsay or conjecture—at his disposal, and each narrator’s response is conditioned by individual experience and background. Thus, Miss Rosa’s idea of Sutpen depends equally upon her Calvinist background and her failure to guess why Henry Sutpen killed Charles Bon. Quentin’s father responds with an ironic detachment, conditioned by his insistence upon viewing the fall of the South as the result of the workings of an inevitable fate. As Quentin and Shreve do, the reader must attempt to coordinate the various partial histories of the Sutpen family into a meaningful whole—with the added irony that the reader must also deal with Quentin’s romanticism. In effect, the reader becomes another investigator, one whose concern is with the entire scope of the novel rather than with only the Sutpen family.

At the heart of the novel is Thomas Sutpen and his grand design, and the reader’s comprehension of the meaning of the novel depends upon the discovery of the implications of this design. Unlike the chaos of history the narrators perceive, Sutpen’s design would, by its nature, reduce human history and experience to a mechanical and passionless process that he could control. The irony of Sutpen’s failure lies in the fact that he could not achieve the design precisely because he is unable to exclude such human elements as Charles Bon’s need for his father’s love and recognition. Faulkner, however, gains more than this...

(The entire section is 1106 words.)