Criticism > Short Story Criticism > Wilson, Angus - The Wrong Set (1949)
Wilson, Angus - The Wrong Set (1949)
The Wrong Set (1949)
Angus Wilson also spoke, in the review already referred to, of the need for a collection of short stories to hang together, to have some sort of unity. Of the collections he was reviewing, he singled out Louis Auchincloss's The Romantic Egoists as the best in this respect. Wilson, a liberal humanist, did not approve of Auchincloss's "arrogant, neo-aristocratic" outlook, but it had had a good effect artistically, producing a book of stories with "a strict social framework and a convinced social standpoint." The coherence of Wilson's own earliest collections, both The Wrong Set and Such Darling Dodos, is equally recognizable, though his middle-class framework is fluid rather than strict, and his social standpoint, that of a convinced liberal with an instinct for tolerance, allows for the inspection and questioning of values rather than for their dogmatic presentation. A characteristic conformation of Wilson's stories...
[The entire page is 4907 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Rosemary Carr Benét (essay date 1950)
- The Times Literary Supplement (essay date 1957)
- Michael Mitigate (essay date 1957)
- C. B. Cox (essay date 1963)
- Angus Wilson (essay date 1963)
- Jay L. Halio (essay date 1964)
- Malcolm Bradbury (essay date 1966)
- Joyce Carol Oates (essay date 1969)
- Robert Kirsch (essay date 1969)
- Angus Wilson with Frederick P. W. McDowell (interview date 1971)
- Peter Faulkner (essay date 1980)
- Averil Gardner (essay date 1985)
- The Wrong Set (1949)
- Such Darling Dodos
- Wilson as a Short-Story Writer
- J. H. Stape (essay date 1987)
- John Bayley (essay date 1988)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
