Criticism > Short Story Criticism > Nos, Nikolai Gogol - Thomas Seifrid (essay date 1993)
Nos, Nikolai Gogol - Thomas Seifrid (essay date 1993)
Thomas Seifrid (essay date 1993)
SOURCE: Seifrid, Thomas. “Suspicion Toward Narrative: The Nose and the Problem of Autonomy in Gogol's ‘Nos.’” Russian Review 52 (July 1993): 382–96.
[In the following essay, Seifrid situates “The Nose” within the context of Russian history.]
In the final version of “Nos” that Gogol prepared for his 1842 Sochineniia, it is 25 March when Kovalev discovers he has no nose and 7 April when the appendage mysteriously reappears.1 In light of Russian cultural history these dates can hardly appear innocent: the twelve-day gap between them is precisely that obtaining in the nineteenth century between Russia's Julian calendar and the Gregorian chronography of the West, so that the nose is in fact lost and restored overnight. The dates could, of course, be mere artifacts of the dream device Gogol had used in an earlier version of the story to explain away its absurdities...
[The entire page is 9284 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- A. L. Bem (essay date 1928)
- Herbert E. Bowman (essay date 1953)
- Peter C. Spycher (essay date 1963)
- Ivan Yermakov (essay date 1974)
- Thaïs S. Lindstrom (essay date 1974)
- Simon Karlinsky (essay date 1976)
- William Woodin Rowe (essay date 1976)
- Donald Fanger (essay date 1979)
- Richard Peace (essay date 1981)
- James B. Woodward (essay date 1981)
- William Edward Brown (essay date 1986)
- Ann Shukman (essay date 1989)
- Reed Merrill (essay date 1990)
- Sergei Bocharov (essay date 1992)
- Thomas Seifrid (essay date 1993)
- Amos Oz (essay date 1996)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
