Criticism > Short Story Criticism > Nos, Nikolai Gogol - Peter C. Spycher (essay date 1963)
Nos, Nikolai Gogol - Peter C. Spycher (essay date 1963)
Peter C. Spycher (essay date 1963)
SOURCE: Spycher, Peter C. “N. V. Gogol's ‘The Nose’: A Satirical Comic Fantasy Born of an Impotence Complex.” Slavic and East European Journal 7, no. 4 (winter 1963): 361–74.
[In the following essay, Spycher discusses sexual symbolism in “The Nose,” asserting that the loss of the nose symbolizes a loss of sexual power.]
The story “The Nose”1 has everywhere and always met with a great deal of mirth and with an equal amount of puzzlement once the question of its meaning has been raised.2
One of the more recent Gogol' biographers, V. Setchkarev, has advanced the following, at first rather alluring and certainly very convenient opinion. Interpreting Puškin's artistic creed as art for art's sake, Setchkarev argues that, in creating “The Nose,” Gogol' deliberately applied this artistic principle, and simply played with the various devices of story-telling,...
[The entire page is 7339 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- A. L. Bem (essay date 1928)
- Herbert E. Bowman (essay date 1953)
- Peter C. Spycher (essay date 1963)
- Ivan Yermakov (essay date 1974)
- Thaïs S. Lindstrom (essay date 1974)
- Simon Karlinsky (essay date 1976)
- William Woodin Rowe (essay date 1976)
- Donald Fanger (essay date 1979)
- Richard Peace (essay date 1981)
- James B. Woodward (essay date 1981)
- William Edward Brown (essay date 1986)
- Ann Shukman (essay date 1989)
- Reed Merrill (essay date 1990)
- Sergei Bocharov (essay date 1992)
- Thomas Seifrid (essay date 1993)
- Amos Oz (essay date 1996)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
