Criticism > Short Story Criticism > Nos, Nikolai Gogol - Ann Shukman (essay date 1989)
Nos, Nikolai Gogol - Ann Shukman (essay date 1989)
Ann Shukman (essay date 1989)
SOURCE: Shukman, Ann. “Gogol's ‘The Nose’ or the Devil in the Works.” In Nikolay Gogol: Text and Context, edited by Jane Grayson and Faith Wigzell, pp. 64–82. London: Macmillan, 1989.
[In the following essay, Shukman asserts that a valid interpretation of “The Nose” must take into account that which is excluded from the narrative through various omissions, digressions, and ellipses.]
If ‘The Nose’ had been written in French or English, or if, on the other hand, post-structuralism had taken root in Moscow and Leningrad, Gogol's tale might well have become a proof text for deconstructive exegesis. Constructed on a pun, replete with paradoxes, illogicalities, games and mystifications with the reader, the tale is ‘unreadable’ in the sense that it resists any single definitive reading or ‘univocal’ meaning; and indeed, to use deconstructionist terms, it might be argued that it contains...
[The entire page is 8441 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- A. L. Bem (essay date 1928)
- Herbert E. Bowman (essay date 1953)
- Peter C. Spycher (essay date 1963)
- Ivan Yermakov (essay date 1974)
- Thaïs S. Lindstrom (essay date 1974)
- Simon Karlinsky (essay date 1976)
- William Woodin Rowe (essay date 1976)
- Donald Fanger (essay date 1979)
- Richard Peace (essay date 1981)
- James B. Woodward (essay date 1981)
- William Edward Brown (essay date 1986)
- Ann Shukman (essay date 1989)
- Reed Merrill (essay date 1990)
- Sergei Bocharov (essay date 1992)
- Thomas Seifrid (essay date 1993)
- Amos Oz (essay date 1996)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
