Criticism > Short Story Criticism > The Minister's Black Veil, Nathaniel Hawthorne - James B. Reece (essay date 1975)

The Minister's Black Veil, Nathaniel Hawthorne - James B. Reece (essay date 1975)

James B. Reece (essay date 1975)

SOURCE: “Mr. Hooper's Vow,” in ESQ: A Journal of the American Renaissance, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2nd Quarter, 1975, pp. 93-102.

[In the following essay, Reece demonstrates how it is possible to admire Mr. Hooper's vow to wear the veil while condemning the effects of this demonstration of Puritan religiosity.]

“The Minister's Black Veil” (1836) is, even among the stories of Nathaniel Hawthorne, unusually complex in potentialities for meaning. Its power to suggest numerous and often contradictory interpretations is reflected in the fact that its critics are in wide disagreement concerning so fundamental a matter as whether the Reverend Mr. Hooper's act of donning the veil and his subsequent insistence that it never be removed result from marked personal failings or from unusual merit.1 Perhaps the most significant critical challenge of the story is presented in the analysis by Richard Harter...

[The entire page is 7011 words long]

Join eNotes

The above is a free excerpt. Get total access to this content with the: