Criticism > Short Story Criticism > Lovecraft, H. P. - Peter Penzoldt (essay date 1952)
Lovecraft, H. P. - Peter Penzoldt (essay date 1952)
Peter Penzoldt (essay date 1952)
SOURCE: Penzoldt, Peter. “The Pure Tale of Horror.” In The Supernatural in Fiction, pp. 146–90. New York: Humanities Press, 1965.
[In the following excerpt, originally published in a 1952 edition, Penzoldt offers a psychological analysis of Lovecraft's horror tales.]
It is not the highest, but only the pedant and the prig will deny that he enjoys being thrilled, and our superior attitude towards sensational fiction is adopted largely because the blatant and crude fail to produce this effect.
—Forrest Reid
If the short story of the supernatural is often considered as an ‘inferior’ literary genre, this is to a great extent due to the works of those authors to whom preternatural was synonymous with horror of the worst kind. To many writers the supernatural was merely a pretext for describing such things as they would never have dared to mention...
[The entire page is 9458 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- T. O. Mabbott (review date 1940)
- Punch (review date 1951)
- Peter Penzoldt (essay date 1952)
- Winfred S. Emmons, Jr. (essay date 1960)
- Darrell Schweitzer (essay date 1978)
- Donald R. Burleson (essay date 1981)
- S. T. Joshi (essay date 1982)
- Donald R. Burleson (essay date 1983)
- Michael Feingold (review date 1985)
- Arthur Jean Cox (essay date 1987)
- Ben P. Indick (essay date 1987)
- Dirk W. Mosig (essay date 1987)
- Robert Weinberg (essay date 1987)
- Donald Burleson (essay date 1991)
- Stefan Dziemianowicz (essay date 1991)
- Douglas E. Winter (review date 1997)
- Darrell Schweitzer (essay date 2001)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
