Criticism > Short Story Criticism > Huxley, Aldous - Virginia Woolf (review date 1920)
Huxley, Aldous - Virginia Woolf (review date 1920)
Virginia Woolf (review date 1920)
SOURCE: In a review of Limbo, in Aldous Huxley: The Critical Heritage, edited by Donald Watt, 1975, pp. 41-2.
[In the following review of Limbo, originally published in The Times Literary Supplement in 1920, Woolf calls Huxley's stories clever, amusing, interesting, and well written.]
We know for ourselves that Mr. Huxley is very clever; and his publisher informs us that he is young. For both these reasons his reviewers may pay him the compliment, and give themselves the pleasure, of taking him seriously. Instead, that is, of saying that there are seven short stories in Limbo which are all clever, amusing, and well written, and recommending the public to read them, as we can conscientiously do, we are tempted to state, what it is so seldom necessary to state, that short stories can be a great deal more than clever, amusing, and well written. There is another...
[The entire page is 620 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Herbert S. Gorman (review date 1920)
- Virginia Woolf (review date 1920)
- William Jacob Cuppy (review date 1922)
- Times Literary Supplement (review date 1924)
- Arnold Bennett (essay date 1924)
- L. P. Hartley (review date 1926)
- Joseph Wood Krutch (review date 1926)
- Henry Hazlitt (review date 1930)
- Kenneth Payson Kempton (essay date 1953)
- P. H. Newby (review date 1957)
- V. S. Pritchett (review date 1957)
- Arthur F. Beringause (essay date 1964)
- Charles M. Holmes (essay date 1970)
- Donald J. Watt (essay date 1970)
- Maria Schubert (essay date 1984)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
