Criticism > Short Story Criticism > Huxley, Aldous - P. H. Newby (review date 1957)
Huxley, Aldous - P. H. Newby (review date 1957)
P. H. Newby (review date 1957)
SOURCE: In a review of Aldous Huxley's Collected Short Stories, in London Magazine Vol. 4 1957, pp. 65-8.
[In the following review of Collected Short Stories, Newby finds Huxley's short stories strained and anti-intellectual, contending that Huxley is not a true short story writer despite the brilliant analysis and observation revealed in some tales.]
One thinks of Aldous Huxley as an intellectual writer. One associates him with the Twenties, short skirts and chromium plate; and one thinks of him, again, as an historian and pamphleteer, disenchanted with the twentieth century, doubtful whether the past was any better and apprehensive of the future; a pessimist, in short. The Collected Short Stories do not, however, bear this out. They provide no text for a dissertation on Mr. Huxley's ideas as they might have done had he been the intellectual, the sustained critic or satirist one, rather...
[The entire page is 1083 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Herbert S. Gorman (review date 1920)
- Virginia Woolf (review date 1920)
- William Jacob Cuppy (review date 1922)
- Times Literary Supplement (review date 1924)
- Arnold Bennett (essay date 1924)
- L. P. Hartley (review date 1926)
- Joseph Wood Krutch (review date 1926)
- Henry Hazlitt (review date 1930)
- Kenneth Payson Kempton (essay date 1953)
- P. H. Newby (review date 1957)
- V. S. Pritchett (review date 1957)
- Arthur F. Beringause (essay date 1964)
- Charles M. Holmes (essay date 1970)
- Donald J. Watt (essay date 1970)
- Maria Schubert (essay date 1984)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
