Criticism > Short Story Criticism > Coppard, A. E. - Punch (essay date 1927)
Coppard, A. E. - Punch (essay date 1927)
Punch (essay date 1927)
SOURCE: A review of The Field of Mustard, in Punch, Vol. CLXXII, February 23, 1927, pp. 223-24.
[In this essay, the critic praises Coppard for providing fresh interpretations of familiar themes.]
The bright art of the short story has at the moment no more talented exponent than Mr. A. E. Coppard. His tales, or contes, as we should have called them in the good old days when, having never heard of Tchehov, we all swore by Maupassant, are acceptable to the most fastidious of editors. All the stories in The Field of Mustard are well worth reading, and a good half of them are worth rereading. It is not so much what he does as the cunning and lively way he does it. Take, for instance, his name-piece. Two women, returning home from gathering firewood, sit beneath a hedge and discuss a man whom they both have loved. Being no Classicist, I am not sure whether Lucian transcribed the equivalent...
[The entire page is 375 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Malcolm Cowley (essay date 1921)
- The Times Literary Supplement (essay date 1923)
- Hermon Child (essay date 1925)
- C. Henry Warren (essay date 1927)
- Punch (essay date 1927)
- Ford Madox Ford (essay date 1927)
- C. Henry Warren (essay date 1929)
- A. E. Coppard (essay date 1931)
- The New York Times Book Review (essay date 1932)
- Dorothy Brewster and Angus Burrell (essay date 1934)
- H. E. Bates (essay date 1941)
- Punch (essay date 1944)
- William Peden (essay date 1948)
- Wilson Follett (essay date 1948)
- Frank O'Connor (essay date 1963)
- Doris Lessing (essay date 1972)
- Walter Allen (essay date 1981)
- James Gindin (essay date 1985)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
