Criticism > Short Story Criticism > The Chrysanthemums, John Steinbeck - Further Reading
The Chrysanthemums, John Steinbeck - Further Reading
FURTHER READING
CRITICISM
Gullason, Thomas A. “Revelation and Evolution: A Neglected Dimension of the Short Story.” Studies in Short Fiction X, No. 4 (Fall 1973): 347–56.
Discusses how Elisa physically and emotionally “retreats and withdraws into herself” over the course of the story.
Mitchell, Marilyn L. “Steinbeck's Strong Women: Feminine Identity in the Short Stories.” Southwest Review LXI, No. 3 (Summer 1976): 304–15.
Compares Mary Teller of “The White Quail” with Elisa Allen in “The Chrysanthemums,” concluding that both women “have certain needs of the spirit, the abstract nature of which keeps happiness forever elusive.”
Noonan, Gerald. “A Note on ‘The Chrysanthemums’. ” Modern Fiction Studies XII, No. 4 (Winter 1969–70): 542.
Footnote to Elizabeth McMahan's well-known article on the story, noting the use of agricultural...
[The entire page is 385 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Joseph Warren Beach (essay date 1941)
- Kenneth Payson Kempton (essay date 1953)
- Mordecai Marcus (essay date 1965)
- Elizabeth E. McMahan (essay date 1968–69)
- Charles A. Sweet, Jr. (essay date 1974)
- Roy S. Simmonds (essay date 1974)
- Stanley Renner (essay date 1985)
- Louis Owens (essay date 1985)
- John Ditsky (essay date 1986)
- C. Kenneth Pellow (essay date 1989)
- R. S. Hughes (essay date 1989)
- John H. Timmerman (essay date 1990)
- Susan Shillinglaw (essay date 1991)
- Christopher S. Busch (essay date 1993)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
