Criticism > Short Story Criticism > The Cask of Amontillado Edgar Allan Poe - Philip McM. Pittman (essay date 1975)

The Cask of Amontillado Edgar Allan Poe - Philip McM. Pittman (essay date 1975)

Philip McM. Pittman (essay date 1975)

SOURCE: "Method and Motive in 'The Cask of Amontillado'," in The Malahat Review, No. 34, April, 1975, pp. 87-100.

[In the following essay, Pittman argues that the perceived inconsistencies of Poe's tale contribute to its narrative, tonal, and thematic unity, positing that a symbolic schema, in which Fortunato's character assumes diabolic proportions, structures the tale.]

It may prove both presumptuous and superfluous to try to add "yet one word more" to the already respectable body of critical material available on "The Cask of Amontillado." General consensus has it that the story is one of Poe's best, or at least one of his most effective. It is perhaps a measure of the greatness of the story (Hamlet like, I suppose) that, beyond the matter of a successfully sustained effect (whatever that may be, and however we are to cope with it), there is no particular agreement on just how and why the...

[The entire page is 5911 words long]

Join eNotes

The above is a free excerpt. Get total access to this content with the: