Criticism > Short Story Criticism > Billy Budd, Herman Melville - Wendell Glick (essay date 1953)

Billy Budd, Herman Melville - Wendell Glick (essay date 1953)

Wendell Glick (essay date 1953)

SOURCE: “Expediency and Absolute Morality in Billy Budd,” in PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association, Vol. 68, No. 1, March, 1953, pp. 103–10.

[In the following essay, Glick asserts that Billy Budd “is the cogent fruition of a lifetime of observation and study of the eternal conflict between absolute morality and social expediency; and the digression on Nelson, though it intrudes upon the plot, is central to an understanding of Melville's final resolution of this crucial problem.”]

“Resolve as one may to keep to the main road,” Melville wrote in Billy Budd, “some bypaths have an enticement not readily to be withstood. Beckoned by the genius of Nelson, knowingly, I am going to err in such a bypath.”1 With these words of caution to the reader who might object to the “literary sin” of digression, the author of Moby Dick launched...

[The entire page is 3822 words long]

Join eNotes

The above is a free excerpt. Get total access to this content with the:

eNotes Pass