Criticism > Short Story Criticism > Babylon Revisited F. Scott Fitzgerald - Garry N. Murphy and William C. Slattery (essay date 1981)

Babylon Revisited F. Scott Fitzgerald - Garry N. Murphy and William C. Slattery (essay date 1981)

Garry N. Murphy and William C. Slattery (essay date 1981)

SOURCE: "The Flawed Text of 'Babylon Revisited': A Challenge to Editors, a Warning to Readers," in Studies in Short Fiction, Summer, 1981, pp. 315-18.

[In the following essay, Murphy and Slattery argue that a paragraph should be deleted from the "authorized" version of "Babylon Revisited" to reflect Fitzgerald's final intentions for the story.]

No one—not even F. Scott Fitzgerald himself—has ever seen "Babylon Revisited" printed in the final form intended by its author. The reason is astonishingly simple: when the "authorized" version (an extensive revision of the original 1931 Saturday Evening Post story) was printed by Scribners in Taps at Reveille, it contained a monumental editorial error, and, as far as we can determine, that error has been preserved, unremarked, in all subsequent collections and anthologies.

The error occurs early in the...

[The entire page is 1791 words long]

Join eNotes

The above is a free excerpt. Get total access to this content with the: