Criticism > Short Story Criticism > Agnon, S. Y. - Esther Fuchs (essay date 1983)
Agnon, S. Y. - Esther Fuchs (essay date 1983)
Esther Fuchs (essay date 1983)
SOURCE: "'Edo and Enam'—The Ironic Perspective," in Modern Language Studies, Vol. 13, No. 1, Winter, 1983, pp. 85-100.
[In the following essay, Fuchs maintains that an understanding of Edo and Enam as an ironic story enables the reader to make sense of the story's "strangeness," namely its "digressions, internal contradictions, sudden transitions from realism to phantasy [sic], neologisms and anachronisms."]
1. INTRODUCTION
It would seem that a story as widely explained and thoroughly interpreted as Edo and Enam requires no further explanations. The numerous allegorical interpretations of this enigmatic story left hardly any detail in its originally confusing state. What the momentous critical quest for clarity failed to acknowledge, however, is the literary significance of the presumably meaningless elements in the story. Based on the proposition that in literature...
[The entire page is 7594 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Curt Leviant (essay date 1970)
- Baruch Hochman (essay date 1970)
- Robert Alter (essay date 1972)
- Leon I. Yudkin (essay date 1974)
- Bernard Knieger (essay date 1975)
- Harold Fisch (essay date 1975)
- Esther Fuchs (essay date 1983)
- David Aberbach (essay date 1984)
- Esther Fuchs (essay date 1985)
- Lev Hakak (essay date 1986)
- Yair Mazor (essay date 1986)
- Naomi Sokoloff (essay date 1988)
- Miri Kubovy (essay date 1989)
- Gershon Shaked (essay date 1989)
- Lippman Bodoff (essay date 1993)
- Nitza Ben-Dov (essay date 1993)
- Naomi B. Sokoloff (essay date 1994)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
